2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.113494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDBP-Pred: Prediction of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA-binding proteins by extending consensus sequence and K-segmentation strategies into PSSM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the large number of publications on prediction of DNA binding proteins, the investigation on ssDNA binding protein prediction is limited so far. To our knowledge, currently there are only four published studies on SSB prediction using machine learning-based approaches [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. These methods typically consist of four major steps as shown in Figure 3 : (1) dataset generation for training and testing; (2) features for learning and prediction; (3) classification models; and (4) performance evaluation.…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Methods For Ssb Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the large number of publications on prediction of DNA binding proteins, the investigation on ssDNA binding protein prediction is limited so far. To our knowledge, currently there are only four published studies on SSB prediction using machine learning-based approaches [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. These methods typically consist of four major steps as shown in Figure 3 : (1) dataset generation for training and testing; (2) features for learning and prediction; (3) classification models; and (4) performance evaluation.…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Methods For Ssb Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the prediction of SSBs has been generally carried out for differentiation between SSBs and dsDNA binding proteins (DSBs). Essentially all the methods use the same training and independent test sets from the work by Wang et al [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. The training set (Uniprot1065) consists of 873 DSBs and 183 SSBs, which were culled from UniProtKB/SwissProt with a sequence identity cutoff at 0.7.…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Methods For Ssb Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the above-cited methods have shown great contribution in prediction of drug-target interaction, however, each predictor has its limitation. For example, structure-based methods are expensive and limited applications due to the unavailability of structural information of all proteins in the databanks 19 21 . Most existing predictors have used conventional feature extraction methods such as amino acid composition, dipeptide composition, and position specific scoring matrix, however, these approaches do not effectively explore the important features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires a sufficient quantity of cells, therefore, human male semen cells are usually used. From those cells, one can either observe locations where the chromosome broke and recombination occurred using, for instance, fluorescence [24], illumina sequencing [25], or identifying binding proteins [26] and their binding sites [27][28][29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%