2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11219-022-09593-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrum for safety: an agile methodology for safety-critical software systems

Abstract: In the last years, agile methodologies are gaining substantial momentum, becoming increasingly popular in a broad plethora of industrial contexts. Unfortunately, many obstacles have been met while pursuing adoption in secure and safe systems, where different standards and operational constraints apply. In this paper, we propose a novel agile methodology for the development and innovation of safety-critical systems. In particular, we developed an extension of the well-known Scrum methodology and discussed the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology to conduct the SM, as depicted in Figure 5, was based on the guidelines proposed by Petersen et al (2015). The SM was motivated by the increase in the adoption of agile methods/practices in the safety-critical system development, as reported in many studies (Ge et al (2010), Paige et al (2011), McHugh et al (2013, Lukasiewicz and Górski (2016), , Hanssen et al (2018), and Barbareschi et al (2022)). The gaps between the traditional development of these systems, the safety standards recommendations, and agile methods and practices also encourage the need for this SM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology to conduct the SM, as depicted in Figure 5, was based on the guidelines proposed by Petersen et al (2015). The SM was motivated by the increase in the adoption of agile methods/practices in the safety-critical system development, as reported in many studies (Ge et al (2010), Paige et al (2011), McHugh et al (2013, Lukasiewicz and Górski (2016), , Hanssen et al (2018), and Barbareschi et al (2022)). The gaps between the traditional development of these systems, the safety standards recommendations, and agile methods and practices also encourage the need for this SM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%