2016
DOI: 10.4172/1948-5948.1000265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrub Typhus and Leptospirosis: The fallacy of Diagnosing with IgM Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitation of the present study is that we could not accurately determine the etiological agent/ agents in these cases as we could not perform the gold standard plaque reduction and neutralization test (PRNT) due to logistic reasons. Similarly, cross-reactivity or co-infection in hyperendemic regions [ 28 ] may explain the co-positivity of scrub typhus and viruses, as was also indicated by the PCR results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The limitation of the present study is that we could not accurately determine the etiological agent/ agents in these cases as we could not perform the gold standard plaque reduction and neutralization test (PRNT) due to logistic reasons. Similarly, cross-reactivity or co-infection in hyperendemic regions [ 28 ] may explain the co-positivity of scrub typhus and viruses, as was also indicated by the PCR results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Data on cross-reactivity of various serological tests among these infections are limited. While analyzing serological and PCR-based molecular assays, molecular confirmation of scrub typhus and leptospirosis coinfection was established in only 1 among 10 IgM ELISA positive cases [24]. Clinical diagnosis of coinfections is complex in patients with AUF, as the initial symptoms, signs, and laboratory investigations overlap as is evident in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Possible reasons for a positive dengue serology could have been persistent antibodies from a previous infection, recent asymptomatic infection, concurrent infection, or cross-reactivity with flaviviruses such as West Nile Virus or Japanese Encephalitis. 13 The patient also had positive IgM antibodies against Legionella pneumophila, but the urinary antigen was negative. In view of a negative antigen test, low specificity of the serologic test, low incidence of legionellosis in the Indian subcontinent, and absence of therapeutic response to a trial of fluoroquinolones, the diagnosis of legionellosis was considered unlikely in this patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%