2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrotal gunshot injury: A case report

Abstract: Incidence of firearm injuries generally and scrotal injuries specifically varies between regions and countries. Patients admitted to the emergency department for gunshot wounds to external genitalia require a thorough assessment. We report the case of a 33-year-old patient who was shot in the thigh and scrotum resulting in a unilateral orchidectomy. In this article, we detail key elements of care for this type of injuries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with orchidectomy rate of 23%-55% in most series [10,13,17]. Most orchidectomies carried out for genital GSWs are unilateral [27], and this is exemplified by patient 1 in this report.…”
Section: Fig 1 X-ray Left Thigh Showing Radio-opaque Bullet In Soft Tissuesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is consistent with orchidectomy rate of 23%-55% in most series [10,13,17]. Most orchidectomies carried out for genital GSWs are unilateral [27], and this is exemplified by patient 1 in this report.…”
Section: Fig 1 X-ray Left Thigh Showing Radio-opaque Bullet In Soft Tissuesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A comparable case study published by Kadouri et al, detailed how scrotal gunshot injuries were managed with computed tomography (CT) and surgical intervention, without detailed sonographic imaging preoperative or postoperative. 7 The outcomes were reported in terms of surgical success, with no mention of subsequent size changes. In contrast, the current case study approach included not only immediate intervention but also detailed assessments of testicular size and preservation of arterial and venous flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%