2002
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.75.891.750283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrotal calcification: ultrasound appearances, distribution and aetiology

Abstract: This pictorial review illustrates the ultrasound appearances of scrotal calcification, distinguishing between intratesticular and extratesticular calcification. Intratesticular calcification may be due to phleboliths, spermatic granulomas or vascular calcification, or it may occur in association with tumours. Extratesticular calcification is more frequently encountered and is usually related to previous inflammatory disease of the epididymis. Testicular microlithiasis, a rare condition characterized by multipl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0
14

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
33
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…2C,D), to the best of our knowledge, is a novel finding in a mutant mouse model and reminiscent of testicular microlithiasis in humans. Detected by testicular ultrasound, this rare condition in humans is characterized by multiple scattered echogenic foci (measuring 1-3 mm in diameter) within the testis (Bushby et al, 2002). These microliths are thought to form owing to severe seminiferous tubule damage and cell degeneration, although the etiology of this damage, and how or why they form, remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2C,D), to the best of our knowledge, is a novel finding in a mutant mouse model and reminiscent of testicular microlithiasis in humans. Detected by testicular ultrasound, this rare condition in humans is characterized by multiple scattered echogenic foci (measuring 1-3 mm in diameter) within the testis (Bushby et al, 2002). These microliths are thought to form owing to severe seminiferous tubule damage and cell degeneration, although the etiology of this damage, and how or why they form, remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical US appearance has been described as multiple (generally accepted as more than five) small (1-3 mm) non-shadowing echogenic foci randomly scattered throughout the testicular parenchyma [1] . Acoustic shadowing is not seen, probably due to the small size of the calcifications [2] . It is generally accepted that TM consists of calcified cores surrounded by concentric layers of collagen fibers located in the lumen of the seminiferous tubules [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meanwhile, recent evidence in pediatric patients indicate that TM may consist of extratubular microcalcospherites associated with a double layer of Sertoli cells, which are probably related to the tubular basement membrane components that induce the development of an annular tubular pattern [4] . Although the exact causes of TM are not known, microliths may be re- lated to Sertoli cell dysfunction secondary to abnormal gonadal embryogenesis [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is characterized by the presence of echogenic foci within the testis parenchyma, measuring 1-3 mm in diameter, without shadowing (Bushby et al, 2002). TM is usually an asymptomatic finding at ultrasonography and is thought to be the result of microtubular damage, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%