2023
DOI: 10.1049/nbt2.12115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

scRNA‐seq data analysis method to improve analysis performance

Abstract: With the development of single‐cell RNA sequencing technology (scRNA‐seq), we have the ability to study biological questions at the level of the individual cell transcriptome. Nowadays, many analysis tools, specifically suitable for single‐cell RNA sequencing data, have been developed. In this review, the currently commonly used scRNA‐seq protocols are discussed. The upstream processing flow pipeline of scRNA‐seq data, including goals and popular tools for reads mapping and expression quantification, quality c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a multiplicative characterization of the NB or Poisson mean is typical in both the frequentist 48-50 and the Bayesian 51,52 literature when modeling sequence count data. The set of n size factors is represented as s = [ s i ] N ×1 , capturing a range of biological and technical variabilities across samples, such as reverse transcription efficiency, amplification/dilution efficiency, and sequencing depth 53 . To ensure identifiability between these two parameters, we set s i proportional to the summation of the total read counts across all genes at spot i 54 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a multiplicative characterization of the NB or Poisson mean is typical in both the frequentist 48-50 and the Bayesian 51,52 literature when modeling sequence count data. The set of n size factors is represented as s = [ s i ] N ×1 , capturing a range of biological and technical variabilities across samples, such as reverse transcription efficiency, amplification/dilution efficiency, and sequencing depth 53 . To ensure identifiability between these two parameters, we set s i proportional to the summation of the total read counts across all genes at spot i 54 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After cell-level quality control, data normalization is a prerequisite to correct for cell-to-cell differences due to technical variability such as capture efficiency, amplification biases, and sequencing depth (number of transcripts detected per cell) [19]. If data is not normalized properly, downstream analysis such as comparison of gene expression and clustering of subpopulations would be biased.…”
Section: ) Normalization Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods and algorithms have been developed to mitigate the impact of batch effects and noise in scRNAseq data. These methods aim to enhance the comparability and quality of scRNA-seq data across various samples [75,76]. For example, matching mutual nearest neighbors (MNNs) in the high-dimensional expression space is an effective and useful approach to correcting batch effects in scRNA-seq data.…”
Section: Future Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%