2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13735-017-0130-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Script identification algorithms: a survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the Brahmic script uses the Abugida writing system, which is used for most Indic languages [4]. Numerous character recognition algorithms have been proposed to transition to a paperless society [5], [6], [7], [8]. The character recognition survey studies come in several forms, but most are based on offline character recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the Brahmic script uses the Abugida writing system, which is used for most Indic languages [4]. Numerous character recognition algorithms have been proposed to transition to a paperless society [5], [6], [7], [8]. The character recognition survey studies come in several forms, but most are based on offline character recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Script recognition is essential for automatically understanding papers that are written in hand. Authors categorized and examined numerous script identification techniques for document photographs in [7], and they compared the various schemes based on their advantages and shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Script type identification plays a significant role of identifying the script type of the text, from mono/multi-lingual text document, and feeding the text to appropriate OCR for character recognition. Many methods have been proposed in the literature for script type identification from a multiscript/monoscript document images [1]. Significant work has been carried out for printed documents compared to handwritten documents [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%