2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2874544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scribble-Supervised Segmentation of Aerial Building Footprints Using Adversarial Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we set the number of positive scribbles N s pos to 1. To sample negative scribbles, [29] proposed a "background scribble generation" method via Random Walks. Different from their works, we simply cut the background scribble into several pieces after inverting the ground truth mask.…”
Section: Simulating User Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we set the number of positive scribbles N s pos to 1. To sample negative scribbles, [29] proposed a "background scribble generation" method via Random Walks. Different from their works, we simply cut the background scribble into several pieces after inverting the ground truth mask.…”
Section: Simulating User Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since SE-Net [41] only adopts the global average pooling [43] (pp. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], it can encode the entire spatial feature on a channel as a global feature, which is effectively used for standard image segmentation. However, the most important channels in an interactive segmentation task are mostly decided by the user-interactions.…”
Section: Attention-guided Convolution (Agc) Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of scribbles is a viable alternative to full annotations due to its simplicity. A combination of scribbledsupervised learning and object dependent regularization has shown success in semantic segmentation of natural images (20)(21)(22). Scribble2Label (23) was recently proposed in the context of cell segmentation, outperforming methods such as (20,24,25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%