2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1740-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screw placement in percutaneous acetabular surgery: gender differences of anatomical landmarks in a cadaveric study

Abstract: The findings emphasise the relevance of osseous landmarks in acetabular surgery. By adhering to easily identifiable structures, screw placement can be safely performed. Significant gender differences must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We increased the diameter of virtual cylinder progressively and monitored the virtual screw in the views of coronal plane, sagittal plane and horizontal plane, without violating the cortices and articular surface. Compared with previous human cadaveric studies [23,24], the method used in our study not only saves manpower, materials and nancial resources, but also can be repeated and veri ed by test results with high reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We increased the diameter of virtual cylinder progressively and monitored the virtual screw in the views of coronal plane, sagittal plane and horizontal plane, without violating the cortices and articular surface. Compared with previous human cadaveric studies [23,24], the method used in our study not only saves manpower, materials and nancial resources, but also can be repeated and veri ed by test results with high reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We increased the diameter of virtual cylinder progressively and monitored the virtual screw in the views of coronal plane, sagittal plane and horizontal plane, without violating the cortices and articular surface. Compared with previous human cadaveric studies [ 23 , 24 ], our method greatly saved manpower, material and financial resources, and can be repeated and verified through highly reliable test results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a relative angle. In surgery, the horizontal and sagittal planes were difficult to define because of the posture change of the patients [ 19 ]. Moreover, the CT data may have error when the different postures of patients were adjusted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%