2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Young Children with a First Febrile Urinary Tract Infection for High-grade Vesicoureteral Reflux with Renal Ultrasound Scanning and Technetium-99m-labeled Dimercaptosuccinic Acid Scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[13,14] Although the diagnosis of dilating VUR is missed in a small subgroup of children at risk of developing severe kidney damage, some studies have supported this strategy having high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for predicting clinically significant VUR. [15][16][17] However, conclusions from two meta-analyses have demonstrated that acute-phase DMSA scintigraphy for predicting VUR was not accurate enough in children with fUTI. [18,19] In addition, it should be emphasized that there is no certain distinction between radiologically revealed congenital renal dysplasia and parenchymal inflammatory changes associated with acute pyelonephritis in young children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14] Although the diagnosis of dilating VUR is missed in a small subgroup of children at risk of developing severe kidney damage, some studies have supported this strategy having high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for predicting clinically significant VUR. [15][16][17] However, conclusions from two meta-analyses have demonstrated that acute-phase DMSA scintigraphy for predicting VUR was not accurate enough in children with fUTI. [18,19] In addition, it should be emphasized that there is no certain distinction between radiologically revealed congenital renal dysplasia and parenchymal inflammatory changes associated with acute pyelonephritis in young children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Evidence to support the use of RUS in VUR is in the setting of initial workup of children with febrile UTI and VUR diagnosis alongside VCUG and DMSA. [7][8][9]19 Additionally, RUS is beneficial as a follow-up imaging modality at discharge and 4 to 6 weeks post-surgical correction of VUR to screen for ureteral obstruction. [7][8][9] The approximate cost of abdominal ultrasound in Alberta is $150 based on a cost to interpret the result by a pediatric radiologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9]19 Additionally, RUS is beneficial as a follow-up imaging modality at discharge and 4 to 6 weeks post-surgical correction of VUR to screen for ureteral obstruction. [7][8][9] The approximate cost of abdominal ultrasound in Alberta is $150 based on a cost to interpret the result by a pediatric radiologist. There are additional indirect costs, such as parental time off work, hospital parking and ultrasound technician time, which are more challenging to measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C o n s i d e r a n d o q u e l a s g u í a s d e 1 9 9 9 aseguraban el diagnóstico de RVU en el primer episodio de ITU en todos los pacientes y teniendo en cuenta que la versión de 2011 recomienda omitir la CUGM si la ecografía es normal (hallazgo observable en aproximadamente el 33% de los casos), 12 inferimos que la capacidad diagnóstica de RVU frente a un primer episodio de ITU disminuye al 67%. Con una potencia del 80% y un nivel de confianza de 95%, 21 pacientes por grupo (estudiados en el primer episodio versus los estudiados ante la recurrencia) serían necesarios para evidenciar dicha diferencia de proporciones.…”
Section: Análisis Estadísticounclassified