2012
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41

Abstract: Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US offered to women in the general population with dense breasts can aid detection of small mammographically occult breast cancers (cancer detection rate, 0.8-10 cancers per 1000 women screened), although the overall PPV is low.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

22
297
4
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
22
297
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12] The positive predictive value of biopsy in a study by Parris et al 14 was reported to be 5.5%, similar to that reported by Hooley et al 13 (5.6%). These values were lower than our study findings, as well as other reported data, such as those of Berg et al, 8 whose study reported a value of 8.9%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[9][10][11][12] The positive predictive value of biopsy in a study by Parris et al 14 was reported to be 5.5%, similar to that reported by Hooley et al 13 (5.6%). These values were lower than our study findings, as well as other reported data, such as those of Berg et al, 8 whose study reported a value of 8.9%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…When reporting on Connecticut's experience in the first year after the mandate, Hooley et al 13 discussed an overall cancer detection rate of 3.2 per 1000. Parris et al, 14 also reporting on their initial experience after the Connecticut law, found a cancer detection rate of 0.18%: approximately 2 cancers per 1000 women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, ultrasound and MRI are not suitable for screening, the former because it is examiner-dependent and time-consuming, the latter because it is expensive and has a greatly varying specificity [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Biophotonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%