2002
DOI: 10.1002/env.533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening the Hanford tanks for trapped gas

Abstract: The Hanford Site is home to 177 large, underground nuclear waste storage tanks. This article describes a screening study carried out in the mid 1990s that used the tank waste level measurements to assess the tanks for potential flammable gas hazards. At the time of the study, 25 of the 177 tanks were on the flammable gas watch list. The use of this monitoring data provided additional insight, resulting in operational changes on the Hanford site. The waste level measurements used in this study were made primari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1981, the waste surface level has subsided about 5 inches and the ILL has increased about 10 in. (Whitney 1995). This indicates a gradual gas accumulation, probably in pore-filling bubbles.…”
Section: Conditions In Candidate Tanksmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since 1981, the waste surface level has subsided about 5 inches and the ILL has increased about 10 in. (Whitney 1995). This indicates a gradual gas accumulation, probably in pore-filling bubbles.…”
Section: Conditions In Candidate Tanksmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The interstitial liquid level (ILL) is about 123 inches, 66 inches below the waste surface level. Since 1981, the waste surface level has subsided about 5 inches while the ILL has increased about 10 inches (Whitney 1995). This indicates a gradual gas accumulation, probably in pore-filling bubbles.…”
Section: Conditions In Candidate Tanksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best estimate of the retained gas volume is 180 ± 60 cubic meters (6,400 ± 2,000 scf) . The waste level has risen 6 inches since 1981 (Whitney 1995) indicating a gas accumulation of 75 m 3 at 1 atm assuming an in situ pressure of 1.2 atm.…”
Section: Conditions In Candidate Tanksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barometric pressure changes cause the retained gas in the waste to expand or compress, causing the waste surface level and/or the interstitial liquid level to fluctuate. The quantity of retained gas can be estimated from the magnitude of the level fluctuations (Whitney 1995). This technique is not applicable to all tanks because many have a solid waste surface that does not fluctuate with barometric pressure changes, and changes in interstitial liquid level below the surface cannot be measured with sufficient precision to be used.…”
Section: Retained Gas Inventories and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%