2014
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2013.775900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Strategies in the Presence of Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See Wu and Hamada (2009) for a review. For more recent discussions, see Mee (2013) and Draguljic et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…See Wu and Hamada (2009) for a review. For more recent discussions, see Mee (2013) and Draguljic et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here the definition of supersaturated has been widened to include designs that have fewer runs than the total number of factorial effects to be investigated. In particular, Bayesian Doptimal designs have been shown to be effective in identifying active interactions [34]. Note that under this expanded definition of supersaturated designs, all fractional factorial designs are supersaturated under model (1) when p < n.…”
Section: Supersaturated Designs For Main Effects Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main‐effect (ME) focused budget allocation strategy: She may be most interested in the main effect of each individual factor (ie, the μ ( j ) ‘s), while being less concerned about the interaction effects of the factors; Interaction‐effect (IE) focused budget allocation strategy: She may be more interested in the interaction (or nonlinear) effect of each individual factor (ie, the σdj2‘s), while being less concerned about the main effects of the factors. Despite that the main effects of various input variables on a system response are typically of primary focus in practice, interaction effects have been recognized to play significant roles both in theory and practice (Draguljić, Woods, Dean, Lewis, & Vine, ; Vine, Lewis, Dean, & Brunson, ). Ignoring interaction effects may lead to an invalid statistical inference, such as some factors may be wrongly identified as important due to spurious significant main effects whereas truly important ones may be considered unimportant. Main‐and‐interaction‐effect focused budget allocation strategy: She may be equally interested in both effects of each individual factor. …”
Section: Efficient Simulation Budget Allocation Strategies For MMmentioning
confidence: 99%