Screening rates for colorectal cancer in Canada: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Introduction: Implementation of population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs should reduce disparities in participation in CRC screening. We estimated CRC screening rates in 2012 in Canada and assessed predictors of screening in provinces with and without well-established population-based screening programs. Methods:We used data from the Canadian Community Health Survey for 2012 to calculate the prevalence of up-to-date CRC screening, defined as fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) within 2 years before the survey or flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy within 10 years before the survey, or both. Weighted proportions of individuals with up-to-date screening were calculated and logistic regression analysis performed to assess predictors of up-to-date CRC screening, including differences in participation by income level. Results:The prevalence of up-to-date CRC screening among people 50-74 years of age in 2012 was 55.2%, ranging from 41.3% in the territories to 67.2% in the province of Manitoba. The rate for sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy was 37.2% (highest in Ontario, at 43.3%), and for FOBT it was 30.1% (highest in Manitoba, at 51.7%). About 41% of those who had an FOBT also had a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Individuals in the highest income group were more likely than those in lower-income groups to be up to date with CRC screening, even in provinces with well-established population-based screening programs.Interpretation: More than half of Canadians were up to date with CRC screening in 2012, but there were large differences among provinces. Differences by income group in provinces with population-based screening programs need particular attention. Abstract E150CMAJ OPEN, 3(2)

Geographic variation and factors associated with colorectal cancer incidence in Manitoba

“…21 The nature of Manitoba's universal health care plan (no premiums, comprehensive coverage of all residents irrespective of their age or SES, and continuous efforts to reduce potential SES disparities in access to health care services across the province) may also be contributing to the lack of CRC incidence variability by income. Our results are in contrast to the higher CRC incidence consistently reported among individuals living in lower SES areas in the US.…”

Extensive screening for occult cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism: not so useful?

“…The screening for cancers in Canada is among the best in the world [4]; the study's findings could therefore not be applicable to populations where screening programs are not so well done, and where unprovoked venous thromboembolism most frequently may be the first manifestation of neoplasm.…”

Clinical Practice Guideline on Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a Family History of Nonhereditary Colorectal Cancer or Adenoma: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Banff Consensus

“…Rates in the United States and Canada were about 25%-35% before 2003, but have increased to 55%-60% in 2012-2013 surveys. 8,9 Individuals with an FH of CRC are more likely to adhere to CRC screening recommendations compared to those with no FH. 3 But even among this higher-risk population, participation rates remain less than optimal.…”