2003
DOI: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00645-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening performance of first-trimester nuchal translucency for major cardiac defects: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In an early report, the NT had a sensitivity of 56% for detecting CHD using the 95th percentile and 40% using the 99th percentile cutoff. 119 Subsequent studies have demonstrated a much lower sensitivity: 31% (range, 25%-55%) in a meta-analysis using the 99th percentile 77 and only 10% to 15% in several studies of low-risk populations using the 99th percentile threshold. 78,120,121 The likelihood of a fetus with normal karyotype having CHD once an increased NT is detected increases from 1% to ≈3% for NT above the 95th percentile and to ≈6% for NT at or above the 99th percentile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an early report, the NT had a sensitivity of 56% for detecting CHD using the 95th percentile and 40% using the 99th percentile cutoff. 119 Subsequent studies have demonstrated a much lower sensitivity: 31% (range, 25%-55%) in a meta-analysis using the 99th percentile 77 and only 10% to 15% in several studies of low-risk populations using the 99th percentile threshold. 78,120,121 The likelihood of a fetus with normal karyotype having CHD once an increased NT is detected increases from 1% to ≈3% for NT above the 95th percentile and to ≈6% for NT at or above the 99th percentile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first large study on the subject reported a sensitivity of 56% for critical CHD, requiring surgical treatment (Hyett et al, 1997b). A subsequent meta-analysis including other seven studies (Makrydimas et al, 2003) reported a sensitivity of 30%. In a pooled analysis of data from four large centers the same author found that a NT ≥2.5 and ≥3.5 mm was found in 35.5 and 23%, respectively, of 397 euploid fetuses with major CHD (Makrydimas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Congenital Heart Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meta-analysis published by Makrydimas et al 24 , the estimated sensitivity of NT in the screening of CHD was 37%. This large variation of sensitivity among different studies is mainly attributable to the following factors:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%