E. Coli Gene Expression Protocols
DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-301-1:235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Peptide/Protein Libraries Fused to the λ Repressor DNA-Binding Domain in E. coli Cells

Abstract: Different subsets of the materials listed below are needed for the different protocols © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1 Highly representative repressor fusion libraries are critical for a successful screening. In addition to methods described in popular cloning manuals (14,15), construction of repressor fusion libraries have been described (3-5). Note that genomic libraries require higher coverage than is needed for genome sequencing because large numbers of fusion joints within every gene are needed for libr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reinforce the identification of genes, an IST library was constructed. These libraries are based on the ability of expressed fusion proteins consisting of the Nterminal DNA-binding domain of the CI repressor and sequences encoded by randomly cloned fragments from the target genome to reconstitute repressor function (40). As CI requires separate DNA-binding and dimerization domains, immunity is conferred when the fragment of target DNA is in frame with CI and encodes a stretch of amino acid residues capable of homotypic interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reinforce the identification of genes, an IST library was constructed. These libraries are based on the ability of expressed fusion proteins consisting of the Nterminal DNA-binding domain of the CI repressor and sequences encoded by randomly cloned fragments from the target genome to reconstitute repressor function (40). As CI requires separate DNA-binding and dimerization domains, immunity is conferred when the fragment of target DNA is in frame with CI and encodes a stretch of amino acid residues capable of homotypic interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasmids used for expression of cI included pFG157, which expresses full-length cI; pKH101, which expresses the DNA binding domain (DBD) of cI; and pJH370, which expresses a fusion between cI DBD and the leucine zipper of GCN4 (22,23). Plasmid pGB17 expresses cI DBD -Rns(1-154)-FLAG and was constructed by amplifying a fragment of rns from pGPMRns with primers SalIRnsfor (AGTCAGGTCGACGATGGACTTTAAATAC) and RnsFlagBamrv3 (ACGGATCCTACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCAATTGATTCTAT), which added a FLAG epitope tag after codon 154 of rns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AF308740), and pLM101 (GenBank accession no. AF308741) (35)(36)(37). These vectors contain an amber mutation at codon 103 of the cI segment, between the DNA-binding domain and the DNA insert, which is used for screening for insert dependence (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight, and survivors were picked into 96-well plates for further analysis. We performed insert dependence tests as described previously (35)(36)(37) for the EB099, EB100, and EB101 libraries and found that all of the survivors were insert dependent, as judged by the dependence of repressor function on an amber suppressor that allows translation of the insert. Therefore, the other libraries were not evaluated for insert dependence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%