2013
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Outcomes in Older US Women Undergoing Multiple Mammograms in Community Practice: Does Interval, Age, or Comorbidity Score Affect Tumor Characteristics or False Positive Rates?

Abstract: Background Uncertainty exists about the appropriate use of screening mammography among older women because comorbid illnesses may diminish the benefit of screening. We examined the risk of adverse tumor characteristics and false positive rates according to screening interval, age, and comorbidity. Methods From January 1999 to December 2006, data were collected prospectively on 2993 older women with breast cancer and 137 949 older women without breast cancer who underwent mammography at facilities that particip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
83
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although MUC1 is produced in many tissues, we could not find evidence of clinical alterations of organs or tissues besides the kidney. The recall rate for mammograms was 58%, which was similar to the lifetime recall rate of 61.3% in a large study of mammogram screening (16). Renal ultrasounds showed occasional cysts, and medullary cysts were not identified in any patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although MUC1 is produced in many tissues, we could not find evidence of clinical alterations of organs or tissues besides the kidney. The recall rate for mammograms was 58%, which was similar to the lifetime recall rate of 61.3% in a large study of mammogram screening (16). Renal ultrasounds showed occasional cysts, and medullary cysts were not identified in any patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…41, 42 If a woman is misplaced from low density to a high density group, this might lead to anxiety for the woman, possibly increased cases of false positive results and increased possibility of unnecessary tests and potentially 280 overtreatment. This might also lead to false sense of security and loss of confidence in the screening program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debido a los riesgos y costos del sobrediagnós-tico de tumores sin importancia clínica el debate en torno a este tema es de particular interés para utilización óptima de recursos de salud en países como Chile 8,9 . El impacto del aumento de la sospecha mamográfica es difícil de evaluar, pues este trabajo tiene un diseño descriptivo, observacional y transversal.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified