2022
DOI: 10.14715/cmb/2021.67.4.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of the antioxidant and antibacterial effects of extracted essential oils from Thunbergia coccinea, Acacia polyacantha, Polygonum micrpcephallum, Abies spectabilis and Clerodendrum colebrookianum

Abstract: During the previous few decades, it has been seen that there is a rapid emergence of pathogens resistant to multiple antibiotics. This has now become a global crisis. Some unexplored or less explored plants also provide some antibacterial, bactericidal and antioxidant properties. The antibacterial, bactericidal effects of extracted essential oils (EEOs) of Thunbergia coccinea, Acacia polyacantha, Polygonum micrpcephallum, Abies spectabilis and Clerodendrum colebrookianum was tested in comparison with standard … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further differences were found for the endpoint used to report the results of the DPPH test. Whereas in many cases this was based on an IC 50 value (e.g., [ 47 , 54 , 69 ]), despite using a synonym name (such as EC50—half maximal effective concentration [ 41 , 79 ], RC50—50% reduction concentration [ 85 ], or SC50—50% scavenging concentration [ 42 ]), in other cases, different endpoints were used as follows: Percentage of DPPH inhibition measured for a single sample prepared in a wide variety of ways (i.e., very different concentrations, e.g., 5 mg of essential oil diluted to 5 mL with ethanol, treated with 250 µL of DPPH in methanol (5.07 × 10 −4 M) [ 55 ], 100 µL of essential oil mixed with 3.9 mL of DPPH solution [ 86 ], 50 μL/mL [ 87 ], or even without details on the way the sample was processed but referencing a published source without clear statement whether identical amounts were used [ 53 , 82 , 88 ]); Percentage of DPPH inhibition measured on three to five different amounts/concentrations of essential oil with no IC 50 estimation [ 72 , 78 , 89 ]; Equivalents to certain antioxidant substances expressed as mg per gram of essential oil (hydroxytoluene equivalent; ascorbic acid equivalent; Trolox equivalent) [ 90 , 91 ], μM equivalents per gram of essential oil [ 51 ], mM equivalents per ml [ 48 ] or per liter of essential oil [ 56 ], or μg of equivalents per ml of essential oil [ 92 ]. …”
Section: Methods Available For Antioxidant Testing Of Essential Oilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further differences were found for the endpoint used to report the results of the DPPH test. Whereas in many cases this was based on an IC 50 value (e.g., [ 47 , 54 , 69 ]), despite using a synonym name (such as EC50—half maximal effective concentration [ 41 , 79 ], RC50—50% reduction concentration [ 85 ], or SC50—50% scavenging concentration [ 42 ]), in other cases, different endpoints were used as follows: Percentage of DPPH inhibition measured for a single sample prepared in a wide variety of ways (i.e., very different concentrations, e.g., 5 mg of essential oil diluted to 5 mL with ethanol, treated with 250 µL of DPPH in methanol (5.07 × 10 −4 M) [ 55 ], 100 µL of essential oil mixed with 3.9 mL of DPPH solution [ 86 ], 50 μL/mL [ 87 ], or even without details on the way the sample was processed but referencing a published source without clear statement whether identical amounts were used [ 53 , 82 , 88 ]); Percentage of DPPH inhibition measured on three to five different amounts/concentrations of essential oil with no IC 50 estimation [ 72 , 78 , 89 ]; Equivalents to certain antioxidant substances expressed as mg per gram of essential oil (hydroxytoluene equivalent; ascorbic acid equivalent; Trolox equivalent) [ 90 , 91 ], μM equivalents per gram of essential oil [ 51 ], mM equivalents per ml [ 48 ] or per liter of essential oil [ 56 ], or μg of equivalents per ml of essential oil [ 92 ]. …”
Section: Methods Available For Antioxidant Testing Of Essential Oilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage of DPPH inhibition measured for a single sample prepared in a wide variety of ways (i.e., very different concentrations, e.g., 5 mg of essential oil diluted to 5 mL with ethanol, treated with 250 µL of DPPH in methanol (5.07 × 10 −4 M) [ 55 ], 100 µL of essential oil mixed with 3.9 mL of DPPH solution [ 86 ], 50 μL/mL [ 87 ], or even without details on the way the sample was processed but referencing a published source without clear statement whether identical amounts were used [ 53 , 82 , 88 ]);…”
Section: Methods Available For Antioxidant Testing Of Essential Oilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is now a worldwide crisis. In addition to antibacterial, bactericidal, and antioxidant properties, some unexplored or underexplored flora may also have antibacterial, bactericidal, and antioxidant properties [ 26 ]. The demand for antibacterial herbal drugs is increasing due to the acquired antibiotic resistance of different bacteria [ 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%