2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-011-0769-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of repeated dose toxicity data present in SCC(NF)P/SCCS safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients

Abstract: Alternative methods, replacing animal testing, are urgently needed in view of the European regulatory changes in the field of cosmetic products and their ingredients. In this context, a joint research initiative called SEURAT was recently raised by the European Commission and COLIPA, representing the European cosmetics industry, with the overall goal of developing an animal-free repeated dose toxicity testing strategy for human safety assessment purposes. Although cosmetic ingredients are usually harmless for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even more than for the other 3 pillars of the MoA ontology model, the focus of the toxicological aspects is dictated by the nature and intended use of the chemical under investigation. For some cosmetic ingredients, liver and kidney have been previously identified as potential toxicity targets, albeit upon oral administration of high doses to rodents (Vinken et al, 2012). This was based on combined listing of toxicity endpoints as described in available animal testing reports, which is a major source of input for this aspect of the MoA ontology model.…”
Section: Pillar 4: Toxicological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even more than for the other 3 pillars of the MoA ontology model, the focus of the toxicological aspects is dictated by the nature and intended use of the chemical under investigation. For some cosmetic ingredients, liver and kidney have been previously identified as potential toxicity targets, albeit upon oral administration of high doses to rodents (Vinken et al, 2012). This was based on combined listing of toxicity endpoints as described in available animal testing reports, which is a major source of input for this aspect of the MoA ontology model.…”
Section: Pillar 4: Toxicological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, a screening of RDT data present in safety evaluation reports issued by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety between 2000 and 2009 revealed the liver as a potential target of toxicity for cosmetic ingredients based on animal studies using oral gavage. The inflicted hepatotoxicity hereby is mainly manifested as steatosis and cholestasis (Vinken et al, 2012). A plethora of data are already available for populating the different pillars of the RDT MoA ontology model for these 2 specific types of liver toxicity without necessitating the need for large-scale additional experimentation.…”
Section: Application Of the Repeated Dose Toxicity Mode-of-action Ontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference standards for chemical reactivity Compounds with alkylating and oxidizing activity feature prominently in the MoAs of the hepatotoxic drugs (Evans et al 2004;Gomez-Lechon et al 2010) and are significant in the chemical space of cosmetic ingredients (Vinken et al 2012). In this section, we consider oxidizing agents and thiol-selective alkylating agents that share GSH and essential protein thiols as common targets.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity and Stress Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we consider oxidizing agents and thiol-selective alkylating agents that share GSH and essential protein thiols as common targets. For example, quinones are prototypical thiol reagents with both redox and alkylating activities that are a common source of toxicity from drugs and drug metabolites (Evans et al 2004) and are used as colorants in hair dyes (Vinken et al 2012). The first four reference standards described in this section are hydrophilic and characterized by 2-electron chemistry.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity and Stress Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] A critical element of this cluster is its focus on repeated dose toxicity and the adoption of a mode-of-action (MOA) framework based on an understanding of key biological events driven by levels of exposure over time. [4][5][6][7][8] The SEURAT-1 cluster is comprised of five complementary research projects (COSMOS, [9,10] DETECTIVE, [11,12] HeMiBio, [13][14] NOTOX, [15][16][17] Abstract: The aim of the SEURAT-1 (Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animal Testing-1) research cluster, comprised of seven EU FP7 Health projects co-financed by Cosmetics Europe, is to generate a proof-of-concept to show how the latest technologies, systems toxicology and toxicogenomics can be combined to deliver a test replacement for repeated dose systemic toxicity testing on animals. The SEURAT-1 strategy is to adopt a mode-of-action framework to describe repeated dose toxicity, combining in vitro and in silico methods to derive predictions of in vivo toxicity responses.…”
Section: The Seurat-1 Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%