2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-1242-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of extraction methods for Cd and As bioavailability prediction in rhizospheric soil using multivariate analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, heavy-metal pollution caused by the considerable growth of the mining industry and the effects of human activity has called for extensive concern worldwide. Many researchers have performed related researches on mineral composition in coal gangue (Zhou et al, 2012;Fernandes, 1997), chemical speciation of heavy metals in coal gangue (Dang et al, 2002), pollution characteristics of heavy metal in soil (Dragović et al, 2008;Luan et al, 2008), and potential ecological risk assessment of soil heavy-metals contamination around coal gangue piles (Abdu et al, 2011;Krishna and Govil, 2008;Zhao et al, 2012). However, the pollution trend of heavy metal in soil around coal gangue dumps has received less formal attention than it should have.…”
Section: Jiang Et Al: Assessment and Prediction Of Soil Heavy-metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, heavy-metal pollution caused by the considerable growth of the mining industry and the effects of human activity has called for extensive concern worldwide. Many researchers have performed related researches on mineral composition in coal gangue (Zhou et al, 2012;Fernandes, 1997), chemical speciation of heavy metals in coal gangue (Dang et al, 2002), pollution characteristics of heavy metal in soil (Dragović et al, 2008;Luan et al, 2008), and potential ecological risk assessment of soil heavy-metals contamination around coal gangue piles (Abdu et al, 2011;Krishna and Govil, 2008;Zhao et al, 2012). However, the pollution trend of heavy metal in soil around coal gangue dumps has received less formal attention than it should have.…”
Section: Jiang Et Al: Assessment and Prediction Of Soil Heavy-metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil samples were airdried naturally and passed through a 0.075 mm sieve, prepared to be analyzed. The content of heavy metal elements As, Pb, Cu, Zn, Mn, and Cd were determined by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Aglient 7500a, USA), and the pH value was determined by using SJ-4A pH meter (Kim et al 2012). The recovery rates for heavy metals were between 96.3% and 105%.…”
Section: Sampling Detection and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9 However, extraction agents are inconsistent across the previous literature, and 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 , 0.1 M NaOH, 0.5 M NaHCO 3 , sodium acetate and mixed acids, oxidisable organic matter and 1.0 M HCl all have high efficiencies for dening the available fraction of As. [10][11][12][13][14] An extraction procedure provides a response to a given extraction agent rather than a true reection of the labile As pool. The articial changes induced during sampling, extraction and analysis may affect As bioavailability, complicating the development of soil test methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%