2013
DOI: 10.1080/03235408.2013.826540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) varieties againstAscochytablight and its management through biopesticides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that none of the lines was resistant, 8 desi chickpea lines (D-17001, D-17005, D-17008, D-17009, D-17011, D-17023, D-17024 and D-17032) were found moderately resistant with disease severity rating of 4. Our findings agree to the previous findings of (Collard et al, 2003;Rashid et al, 2014;Shah et al, 2015) who also reported that desi types are more resistant to AB disease than kabuli types. It was also recorded that 3 entries (D-17005, D-170025 and a commercial variety Punjab-2008 were tolerant having disease severity rating of 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Results showed that none of the lines was resistant, 8 desi chickpea lines (D-17001, D-17005, D-17008, D-17009, D-17011, D-17023, D-17024 and D-17032) were found moderately resistant with disease severity rating of 4. Our findings agree to the previous findings of (Collard et al, 2003;Rashid et al, 2014;Shah et al, 2015) who also reported that desi types are more resistant to AB disease than kabuli types. It was also recorded that 3 entries (D-17005, D-170025 and a commercial variety Punjab-2008 were tolerant having disease severity rating of 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, selection for chickpea lines with better SNF properties makes sense only in fungal-resistant genetic backgrounds . While efforts have been made to isolate high-nodulating chickpea genotypes (Rupela, 1994(Rupela, , 1997Khurana and Dudeja, 1996;Dudeja et al, 1997) and independently to select for higher resistance to various fungal pathogens (e.g., Pande et al, 2006;Rashid et al, 2014), no attention has been paid to identification of chickpea lines with superior symbiotic performance under conditions of low Zn availability. Once established, such lines could be recommended for regions of traditional chickpea production, most of which include Zn-deficient soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%