2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Mosquito House Entry Points as a Potential Method for Integrated Control of Endophagic Filariasis, Arbovirus and Malaria Vectors

Abstract: BackgroundPartial mosquito-proofing of houses with screens and ceilings has the potential to reduce indoor densities of malaria mosquitoes. We wish to measure whether it will also reduce indoor densities of vectors of neglected tropical diseases.MethodologyThe main house entry points preferred by anopheline and culicine vectors were determined through controlled experiments using specially designed experimental huts and village houses in Lupiro village, southern Tanzania. The benefit of screening different ent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
121
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(45 reference statements)
10
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…funestus-like mosquito, described as a new species within this group of mosquitoes. 25,26 We did not assess the presence of ceilings, but these have also been shown to reduce mosquito entry in houses in urban areas 27 and could have contributed to the absence of anopheline mosquitoes in urban areas of Blantyre as well. Ownership of ITNs was not associated with a reduced number of mosquitoes in either survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…funestus-like mosquito, described as a new species within this group of mosquitoes. 25,26 We did not assess the presence of ceilings, but these have also been shown to reduce mosquito entry in houses in urban areas 27 and could have contributed to the absence of anopheline mosquitoes in urban areas of Blantyre as well. Ownership of ITNs was not associated with a reduced number of mosquitoes in either survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are not vectors of malaria, they are able to transmit lymphatic filariasis and they are nuisance biters, which makes their control important both from a medical viewpoint and for the social acceptability of the intervention. [50][51][52] Conducting both experiments simultaneously would have allowed for comparison of wire mesh screening with fabric screening under the same conditions. Unfortunately logistical limitations meant that a simultaneous comparison was not possible during this study, but this could be addressed in future experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several later studies confirmed that screening the house entry points of mosquitoes can significantly reduce the entry of malaria vectors and other mosquitoes, although the effect size differs per species and according to the method of screening used. 21,51 The method of screening that was used in field experiment I (wire mesh, see section Materials and Methods for details on the application technique) yielded house entry reductions between 87% and 99%, whereas the method that was used in field experiment II (cotton net fabric, see the section "Materials and Methods") resulted in reductions of between 61% and 74%. In part, this difference may be explained by the application of cotton wool to close gaps between the house's structure and the wire mesh in field experiment I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mosquitoes could enter and exit the hut through its open eaves as they do in nature [21], or exit via the six windows. Mosquitoes leaving the hut were caught outside or in window exit traps.…”
Section: (A) Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%