2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening, monitoring, prevention, prophylaxis and therapy for hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with haematologic malignancies and patients who underwent haematologic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review

Abstract: A higher quality of evidence is needed. However, the level of evidence was sufficient to support the recommendations published in this issue of the journal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This position paper was developed from one meeting held in Rome in July 2015 that involved a team of experts from the SIMIT, the SIE, the GITMO and the SIVIM. It is based on a systematic literature review [2]. The initial article underwent several rounds of review by authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This position paper was developed from one meeting held in Rome in July 2015 that involved a team of experts from the SIMIT, the SIE, the GITMO and the SIVIM. It is based on a systematic literature review [2]. The initial article underwent several rounds of review by authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial article underwent several rounds of review by authors. The results of our systematic review [2] were evaluated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology (http://gdt.guideli nedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html) to provide a systematic method of grading both the strength of the recommendation (weak or strong) and the quality of evidence (very low, low, moderate and high). According to GRADE criteria, evidence from randomized controlled studies, initially considered of high quality, were rated down if there was risk of bias, inconsistency of results, indirectness of evidence, imprecision of results and publication bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review summarized evidence from 42 published studies (randomized trials: 7, prospective cohort studies: 9, retrospective studies: 24 and combined retrospective-prospective studies: 2) on managing HBV in the setting of hematological malignancy and HSCT. 62 In patients with lymphoma not receiving prophylaxis, HBV reactivation varies from 24% to 85% in HBsAg-positive patients and 4% to 42% in patients with resolved HBV infection. The risk seems to be higher with the use of Rituximab (and any other anti-CD20 antibody).…”
Section: Hematological Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited data suggests lower reactivation rates in patients with non-lymphoma hematological malignancy (5-28% in HBsAg-positive and 2-20% in resolved HBV infection). 62…”
Section: Hematological Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HBV reactivation rate has been reported to be 24.4%-85% in patients with HBsAg-positive lymphoma and 4.1%-41.5% in lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection [HBsAg negative/hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positive] (10, 11). In recent years, with the use of treatments containing rituximab in B-cell lymphoma patients with HsAg positivity and resolved HBV infection, a serious increase in the rate of HBV reactivation has been observed (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%