2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Mammography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of an HCP recommendation was significantly associated with non-adherence in all 10 of the predictive studies that tested the significance of recommendation on adherence status (Calvocoressi et al, 2004;Juon et al, 2004;Lee-Lin et al, 2007;Levy-Storms et al, 2004;Liang et al, 2009;Lopez et al, 2009;Somanchi et al, 2010;Tang et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2009;Young et al, 2011). Furthermore, six identification studies cited lack of an HCP recommendation as a barrier to screening (Clark & Natipagon-Shah, 2008;Davis et al, 2005;Documét et al, 2008;Fernandez et al, 2005;Paskett et al, 2004;Tejeda et al, 2009).…”
Section: Lack Of An Hcp Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lack of an HCP recommendation was significantly associated with non-adherence in all 10 of the predictive studies that tested the significance of recommendation on adherence status (Calvocoressi et al, 2004;Juon et al, 2004;Lee-Lin et al, 2007;Levy-Storms et al, 2004;Liang et al, 2009;Lopez et al, 2009;Somanchi et al, 2010;Tang et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2009;Young et al, 2011). Furthermore, six identification studies cited lack of an HCP recommendation as a barrier to screening (Clark & Natipagon-Shah, 2008;Davis et al, 2005;Documét et al, 2008;Fernandez et al, 2005;Paskett et al, 2004;Tejeda et al, 2009).…”
Section: Lack Of An Hcp Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 31 studies were included in the review of barriers to screening mammography, including 17 predictive studies (Calvocoressi et al, 2004;Champion & Skinner, 2003;Elkin et al, 2010;Farmer, Reddick, D'Agostino, & Jackson, 2007;Gierisch et al, 2009;Juon, Kim, Shankar, & Han, 2004;Lee-Lin et al, 2007;LevyStorms, Bastani, & Reuben, 2004;Liang et al, 2009;Lopez, Khoury, Dailey, Hall, & Chisholm, 2009;Mack, Pavao, Tabnak, Knutson, & Kimerling, 2009;Schwartz, Fakhouri, Bartoces, Monsur, & Younis, 2008;Somanchi, Juon, & Rimal, 2010;Tang, Solomon, & McCracken, 2000;Wang et al, 2009;Wu & Ronis, 2009;Young, Schwartz, & Booza, 2011) and 14 identification studies (Ahmed, Fort, Elzey, & Bailey, 2004;Ahmed, Fort, Micah, & Belay, 2001;Buki, Borrayo, Feigal, & Carrillo, 2004;Clark & Natipagon-Shah, 2008;Davis, Emerson, & Husaini, 2005;Documét et al, 2008;Fernandez, Palmer, & Leong-Wu, 2005;Fowler, 2006;Gany, Herrera, Avallone, & Changrani, 2006;McAlearney, Reeves, Tatum, & Paskett, 2007;Moy, Park, Feibelmann, Chiang, & Weissman, 2006;Paskett et al, 2004;Peek, Sayad, & Markwardt, 2008;Tejeda, Thompson, Coronado, & Martin, 2009;Thomas & Usher, 2009;Watson-Johnson et al, 2011). Details about the samples, methodologies and barriers of the included studies are presented in Supplemental …”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations