Screening-Instrument für die Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung. Diagnostische Effizienz der deutschen Version des McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder

Kröger, Christoph; Vonau, Melanie; Kliem, Sören; Kosfelder, Joachim

doi:10.1055/s-0030-1248279

Cited by 16 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The MSI consists of 10 true–false self-rated items assessing common symptoms of borderline personality disorder. The German translation of the MSI has demonstrated good psychometric properties (Kröger, Vonau, Kliem, & Kosfelder, 2010; in the current study, α = .81, 95% CI [.73, .87]). If participants scored above the cut-off of 7 (Kröger et al, 2010) on the MSI, the borderline personality disorder section of the SCID-II (Fydrich, Renneberg, Schmitz, & Wittchen, 1997) was conducted to test for possible borderline personality disorder.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 62%

Everyday emotional dynamics in major depression.

Nelson

Klumparendt

Doebler

et al. 2020

Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aimed to investigate the everyday emotional dynamics of depressed individuals, especially the role of emotional inertia, emotional context insensitivity, and emotional variability and instability. Using ecological momentary assessment, 40 currently depressed individuals and 40 healthy controls reported on their current emotional state and current activities 10 times a day for 4 consecutive days. There were no differences in the dynamics of positive affect (PA) between depressed and healthy subjects. Depressed participants' negative affect (NA), however, was found to be more inert than in healthy controls, while at the same time being more variable and more reactive to positive events. There was also an association between emotional instability and depression, but this was rendered nonsignificant when analyses were controlled for emotional variability. Altogether, emotional dynamics of NA appear to be more prominently disturbed in depression compared to PA. Results support earlier findings on NA emotional variability as well as inertia in depressed patients. In addition, there was some evidence for a mood brightening effect in depression.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 62%

Everyday emotional dynamics in major depression.

Nelson

Klumparendt

Doebler

et al. 2020

Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The MSI-BPD (Kröger, Vonau, Kliem, & Kosfelder, 2010 [German translation by S. Hörz]; Zanarini et al, 2003) is a 10-item screening instrument for borderline personality with a dichotomous answer format (yes/no); α current sample = .83.…”

Section: Study 2: Validity Of the Pni: Expanding The Nomological Netmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expanding the Nomological Net of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory: German Validation and Extension in a Clinical Inpatient Sample

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI) is a multidimensional measure for assessing grandiose and vulnerable features in narcissistic pathology. The aim of the present research was to construct and validate a German translation of the PNI and to provide further information on the PNI's nomological net. Findings from a first study confirm the psychometric soundness of the PNI and replicate its seven-factor first-order structure. A second-order structure was also supported but with several equivalent models. A second study investigating associations with a broad range of measures ( DSM Axis I and II constructs, emotions, personality traits, interpersonal and dysfunctional behaviors, and well-being) supported the concurrent validity of the PNI. Discriminant validity with the Narcissistic Personality Inventory was also shown. Finally, in a third study an extension in a clinical inpatient sample provided further evidence that the PNI is a useful tool to assess the more pathological end of narcissism.

show abstract

“…An ROC curve is created when the true positive rate (sensitivity) is plotted against the false positive (1 − specificity) rate. The area under the curve (AUC) can then be calculated using the nonparametric trapezoid method (Hanley & McNeil, 1982) that yields an index of accuracy, which has been used in several other studies to establish criterion validity (Fombonne, 1991;Thapar & McGuffin, 1998). A measure is thought to have low diagnostic accuracy if its AUC is below .7, moderate accuracy from .7 to .9, and high accuracy when greater than .9 (Swets & Pickett, 1982).…”

Section: Convergent Validity With Dimensional and Categorical Measures Of Bpdmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gardner and Qualter (2009) found that the MSI-BPD correlated highly with other BPD screening tools in a mixed community and student sample, and reported that confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the MSI-BPD is an appropriate measure for assessing BPD as a global construct. Since initial validation of the MSI-BPD, the instrument has been translated to other languages for international use (e.g., Kröger, Vonau, Kliem, & Kosfelder, 2010), and has demonstrated promise for use in both population-based treatment studies and primary care settings for clinical and nonclinical adult samples (Gardner & Qualter, 2009).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Validity of the MSI-BPD Among Inpatient Adolescents

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD) has shown validity in adult samples, only one study has explored its validity in adolescents and, to our knowledge, the measure has not been validated with inpatient adolescents. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the reliability, and convergent and criterion validity, of the MSI-BPD in an effort to establish the clinical utility of the MSI-PBD as a screening measure for BPD in inpatient adolescents. A total of 121 adolescents from an acute care inpatient unit were recruited for the study. Convergent validity was examined with established measures of BPD in adolescents, including the use of receiver operating characteristics analyses to establish a clinical cutoff score for the MSI-BPD in predicting a diagnosis of BPD. Criterion validity was examined by using this clinical cutoff to investigate group differences in suicidal ideation and Axis I symptoms, known correlates of BPD. Findings demonstrated support for validity of the MSI-BPD when used among inpatient adolescents, and established a clinical cutoff of 5.5. Taken together, this study demonstrates adequate validity for the MSI-BPD, and suggests it is a valuable screening measure for BPD in adolescent inpatients.

show abstract

Screening-Instrument für die Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung. Diagnostische Effizienz der deutschen Version des McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder

Cited by 16 publications

References 18 publications

Everyday emotional dynamics in major depression.

Everyday emotional dynamics in major depression.

Expanding the Nomological Net of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory: German Validation and Extension in a Clinical Inpatient Sample

The Validity of the MSI-BPD Among Inpatient Adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About