2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00842.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Type 2 diabetes—should it be now?

Abstract: Type 2 diabetes does not fulfil the criteria for population-based mass screening. No screening and intervention studies have been performed, systematically evaluating the positive and negative effects of screening. Furthermore, intervention studies up until now have been restricted to clinically diagnosed patients with diabetes, and most of these have recruited patients with long diabetes duration and early complications. These groups will have a worse prognosis and thus probably show greater benefits of such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, screening strategies are based on progression rates from general populationbased studies referred to in textbooks and guidelines. Our study confirms that these are too low for high-risk settings, which would be the preferable strategy as general popula- tion-based screening programmes are expensive [11], logistically difficult and of questionable benefit [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Normally, screening strategies are based on progression rates from general populationbased studies referred to in textbooks and guidelines. Our study confirms that these are too low for high-risk settings, which would be the preferable strategy as general popula- tion-based screening programmes are expensive [11], logistically difficult and of questionable benefit [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Figure 2 outlines our summary of the criteria currently used by a variety of international health organisations to evaluate population screening. Based on such criteria, there is as yet no justification for population-based screening for Type 2 Diabetes (Borch-Johnsen et al, 2003;Waugh et al, 2007;Wareham & Griffin, 2001), although the case is becoming stronger. Whilst Type 2 Diabetes meets many of the criteria for screening, the main argument against population-based screening is that uncertainty remains about the true benefits arising from the early detection of Type 2 Diabetes through such programmes.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Screening Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Om deze redenen zou men kunnen overwegen de bevolking te screenen op diabetes; er is dan ook een roep om zo'n screening. Het nut daarvan is niet bewezen 6 , maar de American Diabetes Association acht opportunistische screening op diabetes van hoogrisicogroepen in een klinische setting wel geïndiceerd. 7 Niemand weet eigenlijk hoe screening op diabetes het best kan worden uitgevoerd.…”
Section: Inleidingunclassified