Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study
Abstract:Thrombophilia is associated with increased risks of VTE in women taking oral oestrogen preparations and patients undergoing major elective orthopaedic surgery, and of VTE and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with thrombophilia during pregnancy. There is considerable difference in the magnitude of the risks among different patient groups with different thrombophilic defects. In women who are on combined oral contraceptives, the OR of VTE among those who are carriers of the FVL mutation was 15.62 (95% confide… Show more
“…Indeed, the absolute risk of VTE in a woman carrier of FVL mutation is about 0.8% and the absolute risk of obstetric complications is even lower [14]. These conclusions are also supported by a systematic review [13] in which a cost-effectiveness analysis was made and by an economic study [34] both of which did not show a good costeffectiveness ratio of universal screening for thrombophilia. The former two studies refer to the British National Health Service system.…”
Section: Testing Asymptomatic Women For Thrombophiliasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Several studies have demonstrated an association between thrombophilia and obstetric complications, such as RPL, unexplained IUFD, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, FGR and abruptio placentae [12,13,16,20]. A possible association between thrombophilia and a first pregnancy loss has also been shown [49].…”
Section: Screening For Thrombophilia In Pregnant Women With Previous mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnant women carriers of thrombophilia have an increased risk of VTE by 3 to 52 fold depending on the type of thrombophilic defect [4,[8][9][10][11]. Thrombophilia is also associated with pregnancy complications and the strength of this association is controversial depending on the type of obstetric complication and of specific thrombophilia [12,13].…”
Section: Screening For Thrombophilia In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests to be included in the screening for thrombophilia, if testing is indicated Several studies, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, evaluated the association between thrombophilia and VTE or obstetric complications [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The meta-analyses of heterogenous case-control studies suggest an increased prevalence in women with pregnancy complications of the following thrombophilic defects: antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden mutation (FVL), prothrombin 20210A mutation (PTM), mild hyperhomocysteinemia and antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA).…”
Section: Screening For Thrombophilia In Pregnancymentioning
The term thrombophilia describes an increased tendency to develop thrombosis and many laboratory markers with different strengths of association with thrombosis have been identified. The main causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in developed countries is venous thromboembolism (VTE) and obstetric complications. During pregnancy and puerperium the risk for VTE increases due to hemostatic imbalance towards a prothrombotic state, and it is further increased in women carriers of thrombophilia; recent studies have also demonstrated an association between thrombophilia and obstetric complications. These complications are, therefore, considered potentially preventable with the prophylactic administration of anticoagulant drugs, although their efficacy is not proven by data from randomized controlled trials. After a systematic comprehensive literature review and using a rigorous methodology, the expert panel formulated recommendations regarding the usefulness of screening for thrombophilia in pregnancy to identify high-risk women and for the management of antithrombotic prophyalxis. When evidence is lacking, consensus-based recommendations are provided.
“…Indeed, the absolute risk of VTE in a woman carrier of FVL mutation is about 0.8% and the absolute risk of obstetric complications is even lower [14]. These conclusions are also supported by a systematic review [13] in which a cost-effectiveness analysis was made and by an economic study [34] both of which did not show a good costeffectiveness ratio of universal screening for thrombophilia. The former two studies refer to the British National Health Service system.…”
Section: Testing Asymptomatic Women For Thrombophiliasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Several studies have demonstrated an association between thrombophilia and obstetric complications, such as RPL, unexplained IUFD, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, FGR and abruptio placentae [12,13,16,20]. A possible association between thrombophilia and a first pregnancy loss has also been shown [49].…”
Section: Screening For Thrombophilia In Pregnant Women With Previous mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnant women carriers of thrombophilia have an increased risk of VTE by 3 to 52 fold depending on the type of thrombophilic defect [4,[8][9][10][11]. Thrombophilia is also associated with pregnancy complications and the strength of this association is controversial depending on the type of obstetric complication and of specific thrombophilia [12,13].…”
Section: Screening For Thrombophilia In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests to be included in the screening for thrombophilia, if testing is indicated Several studies, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, evaluated the association between thrombophilia and VTE or obstetric complications [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The meta-analyses of heterogenous case-control studies suggest an increased prevalence in women with pregnancy complications of the following thrombophilic defects: antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden mutation (FVL), prothrombin 20210A mutation (PTM), mild hyperhomocysteinemia and antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA).…”
Section: Screening For Thrombophilia In Pregnancymentioning
The term thrombophilia describes an increased tendency to develop thrombosis and many laboratory markers with different strengths of association with thrombosis have been identified. The main causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in developed countries is venous thromboembolism (VTE) and obstetric complications. During pregnancy and puerperium the risk for VTE increases due to hemostatic imbalance towards a prothrombotic state, and it is further increased in women carriers of thrombophilia; recent studies have also demonstrated an association between thrombophilia and obstetric complications. These complications are, therefore, considered potentially preventable with the prophylactic administration of anticoagulant drugs, although their efficacy is not proven by data from randomized controlled trials. After a systematic comprehensive literature review and using a rigorous methodology, the expert panel formulated recommendations regarding the usefulness of screening for thrombophilia in pregnancy to identify high-risk women and for the management of antithrombotic prophyalxis. When evidence is lacking, consensus-based recommendations are provided.
“…For other genetic markers, such an association is suspected and discussed controversially, eg, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and/or A1298C and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G polymorphisms [1-3, 10, 11, 16, 22, 30, 32, 34, 37, 44]. Results of former studies are conflicting regarding whether the single or combined presence of such genetic mutations may further increase the already very high risk for DVT after major orthopaedic surgery, justifying costly preoperative screening and additional antithrombotic prophylactic measures in these patients [5,6,8,18,20,21,23,29,31,36,[40][41][42][43]. One reason for the conflicting results may be found in the different clinical end points set in the studies varying among venographically diagnosed DVT, clinically symptomatic DVT with or without PE, or symptomatic PE only.…”
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after major orthopaedic surgery is a substantial concern. We asked whether the single or combined presence of thrombophilic genetic polymorphisms might further increase the already high risk for venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE) after THA. We therefore compared the prevalence of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 4G/5G polymorphisms between 50 patients with symptomatic DVT within 3 weeks after elective THA and an asymptomatic control group of 85 patients. We found no major difference for the presence of a single mutation between the groups. Factor V Leiden and homozygous MTHFR C667T mutations were of borderline significance with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 3.73 (0.89-15.63) and 2.93 (0.92-9.29), respectively. Patients with homozygous or combined heterozygous status of MTHFR C677T and A1298C mutation had a higher frequency of DVT after elective THA (odds ratio, 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-6.35) than those with wild-type.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.