1976
DOI: 10.1136/jech.30.1.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for spina bifida cystica. A cost-benefit analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a discount rate of 14% was selected as the most suitable considering the current economic situation. This rate is relatively high [23] and therefore could have the effect of minimizing the benefits since the present value of future benefits decreases as the discount rate increases [15]. The selection of a high rate would have the effect of minimizing the benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, a discount rate of 14% was selected as the most suitable considering the current economic situation. This rate is relatively high [23] and therefore could have the effect of minimizing the benefits since the present value of future benefits decreases as the discount rate increases [15]. The selection of a high rate would have the effect of minimizing the benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiotherapy: Approximately 25% of children aged 3 to 10 require physiotherapy [15], and costs are those paid by the B.C. government.…”
Section: Medical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems unlikely that a much more emotive issue could arise than screening for spina bifida. Yet even here cost-benefit analysis has been able to assist decision-making (Hagard et al, 1976).…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysis Of Alternative Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Scottish study identifi ed signifi cant cost savings by screening for spina bifi da cystica in the fetus, with abortion of the positive cases (37). Of course, such a program would be ineffective in any population that found abortion unacceptable in the event of a positive test.…”
Section: Screening For a Single Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%