Screening for retinopathy of prematurity-a comparison between binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and RetCam 120

Wide-field digital retinal imaging versus binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity screening: a two-observer prospective, randomised comparison

“…A number of previous studies have compared the performance of WFDRI and BIO in ROP screening 4 – 6 8 9 14 16. Roth et al found 82% sensitivity and 94% specificity of WFDRI compared with BIO for detecting any stage of ROP 8.…”

“…Roth et al found 82% sensitivity and 94% specificity of WFDRI compared with BIO for detecting any stage of ROP 8. Shah et al found 86% sensitivity and 92% specificity of WFDRI compared with BIO in detecting any stage of ROP, and no case of threshold ROP was missed with WFDRI 16. Yen et al used WFDRI to attempt to predict which eyes would develop threshold disease by evaluating WFDRI images at two distinct gestational time points.…”

Aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity in large preterm babies in South India

“…As 50 babies of the 99 APROP babies were seen before the publication of this revisited classification, that time we had classified them as ‘Fulminate ROP.’2 We reclassified them as APROP while doing this retrospective analysis. Retcam (Clarity Medical Systems, Pleasanton, California, USA) was used to photograph the posterior pole and as much as possible of the periphery for all the cases examined at the base hospital 3. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was carried out in 19 babies.…”

Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 18-month experience with telemedicine screening

“…[14,19,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] However, no study to date has examined infants solely based on this new technology. The Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP) telemedicine outreach initiative was created to provide quaternary ROP screening services to the larger community in the San Francisco Bay Area.…”