2013
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2013.14.74.1345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for refractive error among primary school children in Bayelsa state, Nigeria

Abstract: IntroductionVision screening study in primary school children has not been done in Bayelsa State. This study aims to screen for refractive error among primary school children in Bayelsa State and use the data to plan for school Eye Health Program.MethodsA cross sectional study on screening for refractive error in school children was carried out in Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa State in June 2009. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the study population (pupils aged between 5-15 years)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
15
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were reported by M Shinde et al, (5) (2.3%) and Ibeinmo Opubiri et al, (19) (2.2%). Other studies by Harish Chandra Tiwari et al, (8) (12.4%), KV Pani Madhavi et al, (20) (11.38%) and Kaushik Talukdar et al, (6) (10%) reported higher prevalence of defective vision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar findings were reported by M Shinde et al, (5) (2.3%) and Ibeinmo Opubiri et al, (19) (2.2%). Other studies by Harish Chandra Tiwari et al, (8) (12.4%), KV Pani Madhavi et al, (20) (11.38%) and Kaushik Talukdar et al, (6) (10%) reported higher prevalence of defective vision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result was in consistence with another study conducted by EL-Bayoumy et al in Cairo, which found the prevalence of visual acuity of ( 6/12) level was high (22%) (EL-Bayoumy, 2007). However, Opubiri et al reported that prevalence was low and this disagrees with our study (Opubiri, 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This result was higher than the usual value noted by WHO (20%) and more than the findings of other studies in which prevalence of refractive error was 2.2% -35%. These studies include: Opubiri et al (Opubiri, 2013) which found that refractive error prevalence was 2.2% in both eyes. In Saadoon report, (Saadoon, 2017) the refractive error prevalence was about 35% while the Pi, et al (Pi, 2012) in China found the prevalence of refractive error was about 20.69%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas it was 2.2% in a study conducted by Ibeinmo Opubiri et al 15 In our study 5.42% had scabies, whereas it was 2.9% in a study conducted by Sambo MN et al 16 In our study 28.14% had peduculosis which was more when compared to 10.2% in a study conducted by Serpil Degerli et.al. 17 In the present study the prevalence of worm infestation was 31.51% as compared to 17.6% in a study done by LK Khanal et.al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%