2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00843.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for proximal deep vein thrombosis after acute ischemic stroke: a prospective study using clinical factors and plasma d‐dimers

Abstract: Summary. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains common in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receiving aspirin and graded compression stockings (considered standard thromboprophylaxis in the UK), most events occurring in patients with Barthel indices (BI) of £ 9 (Ôsevere strokeÕ) around the time of admission. In the absence of data indicating improved clinical outcomes with use of low-dose anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, we evaluated the hypothesis that plasma D-dimers (D-d) might be a valuable initial sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VIDAS assay has already been recently shown to be of potential clinical value in prediction of a high-risk group for proximal deep vein thrombosis among patients with acute stroke. 8 We also provide information on the performance of the 3 assays at different cutoff values. It appears that the MDA and VIDAS D-dimer assays may perform marginally better than the Biopool assay as predictors of progressing ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VIDAS assay has already been recently shown to be of potential clinical value in prediction of a high-risk group for proximal deep vein thrombosis among patients with acute stroke. 8 We also provide information on the performance of the 3 assays at different cutoff values. It appears that the MDA and VIDAS D-dimer assays may perform marginally better than the Biopool assay as predictors of progressing ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the limited number of our patients does not permit us to propose prognostic values. The diagnostic value of D -dimers among unselected stroke patients had been previously suggested [11] . Larger cohorts may validate these markers to identify a subgroup with a high risk of DVP/PE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the clinician's index of suspicion must be high and there should be awareness of subtle signs such as slight increases in calf diameter and tension, a raised respiratory rate and/or heart rate, and minor changes in oxygen saturation. It has to be said these clinical signs may only have moderate predictive value, for instance in the MRDTI study of severe ischemic stroke patients a calf diameter change of 1 cm had a sensitivity of 44 % and positive predictive value of 53 %, whilst using 2 cm change had a greater positive predictive value of 78 % but sensitivity fell to 28 % [ 99 ]. Nevertheless, under current processes of care, relying on clinical signs are the mainstay of diagnosis, and knowing the greater risks associated with clinical VTE, it is better to investigate any suspicion and not dismiss them or presume infection or oedema.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Vtementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various things, including the older batch assay and the rehabilitation setting with recruitment 3 months after stroke, probably means this d -dimer level is not applicable for use for acute stroke today. The more recent MRDTI study found the VIDAS ELISA test of 2,096 ng/ml and the IL agglutination test of 1,174 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 78 % and 83 % for proximal DVT, but at the cost of imaging 30 % of the patients [ 99 ].…”
Section: -Dimermentioning
confidence: 97%