2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for pharmaceutical transformation products formed in river sediment by combining ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry with a rapid data-processing method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
62
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21] These techniques are enabled by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Most studies are initially based on laboratory experiments at elevated concentrations to facilitate the identication of TPs, [22][23][24] which are then searched for in environmental samples. 16,25,26 Strategies have also been developed to assist and simplify the detection of TPs directly in natural waters and wastewater, based on the use of characteristic fragmentation 27,28 or mass defect ltering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21] These techniques are enabled by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Most studies are initially based on laboratory experiments at elevated concentrations to facilitate the identication of TPs, [22][23][24] which are then searched for in environmental samples. 16,25,26 Strategies have also been developed to assist and simplify the detection of TPs directly in natural waters and wastewater, based on the use of characteristic fragmentation 27,28 or mass defect ltering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the screening techniques applied increased in recent years and a variety of algorithms were written to automate the screening procedure. In general, the first step is to construct XICs around the exact mass of the suspects [32,42,51,73] or to perform a non-target peak picking on the chromatograms [7][8][9]52,80]. The latter requires a powerful algorithm, which can find all the peaks in a chromatogram, but has the advantage that it lists the m/z and retention-time combination of all the peaks found in an easily searchable peak list.…”
Section: Suspect Versus Non-target Screeningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the majority of these studies, the suspects were anthropogenic contaminants, which are known to occur in the aquatic environment (e.g., several pharmaceuticals, personal-care products and pesticides, and different classes of chemicals, such as surfactants, having homologous series). A recent trend is that potential water contaminants are selected based on the local supply or use of pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals [8,75], or based on predicted or known transformation products of pharmaceuticals and pesticides [9,80]. The complexity of the screening techniques applied increased in recent years and a variety of algorithms were written to automate the screening procedure.…”
Section: Suspect Versus Non-target Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Open-source software is used for peak peaking (e.g., MZmine) and processing of the chromatograms (e.g., enviMass), by noise removal and blank subtraction. Then, a meaningful time trend is acquired and the remaining candidate peaks are compared with a list from UM-PPS or literature for tentative identification [87].…”
Section: Suspect Screening -Prediction Of Transformation Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%