1998
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for human T cell leukaemia/lymphoma virus among blood donors in Sweden: cost effectiveness analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of HIV nationally in 1998 was 0.04/1000 in eligible first time blood donations and 0.004/1000 in repeat donations 42. Although the risks of infection and disease after contaminated transfusion are less with HTLV than with HIV,43 44 screening first time donors for HTLV would not be inconsistent with the present policy of screening all donations for HIV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The prevalence of HIV nationally in 1998 was 0.04/1000 in eligible first time blood donations and 0.004/1000 in repeat donations 42. Although the risks of infection and disease after contaminated transfusion are less with HTLV than with HIV,43 44 screening first time donors for HTLV would not be inconsistent with the present policy of screening all donations for HIV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… ‡Based on the HTLV‐I seroprevalence rate (7/300,000) found among Swedish blood donors 1994‐95 16 . The specificity data (initial results) from testing of the Swedish panel were used for the calculations of the positive predictive values. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data have important implications for cost efficacy studies of interventions to prevent HTLV-I transmission in Europe (for example, antenatal or blood donor screening) as until now analysts have mainly relied on Japanese data 5. Furthermore, the possibility of other HTLV-I associated conditions (uveitis, arthritis, alveolitis) seems to be rarely considered by clinicians.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%