2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13028-018-0389-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for fecal presence of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli and mcr-1 and mcr-2 genes in camel-calves in southern Tunisia

Abstract: Camels (Camelus dromedarius) are known to harbor multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria and to be involved in the transmission of various microorganisms to humans. Data on the occurrence of colistin resistant Escherichia coli as well as mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes in camels are lacking. We investigated the presence of colistin resistance and mcr (1–2) genes in E. coli from the feces of camels in Tunisia. Presumptive E. coli isolates from camel-calves in southern Tunisia were qualitatively scr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, screening for plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes mcr-1 through mcr-5 remained negative for all isolates (data not shown). The absence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance confirms previous reports from Tunisia and suggests that camels do not play a major role as a reservoir for mcr harboring E. coli [38] . However, although we screened for all known variants at the time of analysis, novel mcr genes are emerging globally, and it cannot be excluded that variants including mcr-6 through mcr-8 may have been missed in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study, screening for plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes mcr-1 through mcr-5 remained negative for all isolates (data not shown). The absence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance confirms previous reports from Tunisia and suggests that camels do not play a major role as a reservoir for mcr harboring E. coli [38] . However, although we screened for all known variants at the time of analysis, novel mcr genes are emerging globally, and it cannot be excluded that variants including mcr-6 through mcr-8 may have been missed in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, a study from KSA reported that 26.9% of E. coli isolates from camel fecal samples are ESBL producer (Fadlelmula et al, 2016). In agreement with our findings, another research group from Tunisia reported the absence of colistin resistance genes mcr-1 and mcr-2 in E. coli isolated from camel fecal samples in southern Tunisia territory (Rhouma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In another study from Tunisia, E. coli strains isolated from diarrheic and healthy camel fecal samples showed a high frequency of resistance to tetracycline (52.8%), and ampicillin (37.1%) (Bessalah et al, 2016). In another study from southern Tunisia demonstrated the absence of plasmid-mediated mobilized colistin resistance genes (mcr-1 and mcr-2) in E. coli isolated from camel feces (Rhouma et al, 2018). In an interesting study from coli isolated from camels with those of pathogenic E. coli isolated from human urinary tract infections (UTIs) (Fadlelmula, Al-Hamam, & Al-Dughaym, 2016).…”
Section: Amr In E Coli From Camelsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The mcr-1 gene in these latter was associated with the IS Apl1 and was carried by IncP plasmid while the CMY-2 gene was located on an IncI1 plasmid type (Maamar et al, 2018 ). Furthermore, in this same country, a recent study revealed the absence of mcr-1 and mcr-2 positive Gram-negative bacilli in camel calves in southern Tunisia (Rhouma et al, 2018 ). Likewise, in Egypt, mcr-1 was detected in E. coli isolated from diseased chickens as well as from cows displaying subclinical mastitis (Khalifa et al, 2016 ; Lima Barbieri et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Distribution Of Esbls and Ampc Producers In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 83%