2007
DOI: 10.1027/1901-2276.59.2.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Developmental Risks at 4 Years of Age

Abstract: The present study explored the continuity of normal development between the ages of 4 and 6 and also examined the permanence of any developmental problems. A comprehensive neurodevelopmental screening test (the Lene test) was administered to a sample of 434 children at the age of 4 and again at the age of 6 (n=394). The results suggest significant continuity in development from age 4 to age 6. Normal development is most likely to continue along a predetermined developmental path. The co-occurrence and severity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact represents a considerable deficit, because it is known that especially combined developmental delays usually have moderate or strong expression, while isolated delays have rather a mild expression [16]. Further, combined developmental delays have a tendency to persistence [17]. The knowledge of these facts might be important for diagnostics in the field of childhood development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact represents a considerable deficit, because it is known that especially combined developmental delays usually have moderate or strong expression, while isolated delays have rather a mild expression [16]. Further, combined developmental delays have a tendency to persistence [17]. The knowledge of these facts might be important for diagnostics in the field of childhood development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of exploratory factor analysis, the items for the factors included in the confirmatory factor analysis were selected. The factors at age 4 years (Lene4) were labelled motor–perceptual (eight items, loadings ranged 0.40–0.96); language (six items, loadings ranged 0.74–0.84); and attention–behaviour (four items, loadings ranged 0.74–0.98) 12 . A three‐factor solution was also formed at age 6 years using the factors gross motor (six items, loadings ranged 0.57–0.91); language (six items, loadings ranged 0.58–0.95), and school readiness (six items, loadings ranged 0.56–0.77) 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors at age 4 years (Lene4) were labelled motor–perceptual (eight items, loadings ranged 0.40–0.96); language (six items, loadings ranged 0.74–0.84); and attention–behaviour (four items, loadings ranged 0.74–0.98) 12 . A three‐factor solution was also formed at age 6 years using the factors gross motor (six items, loadings ranged 0.57–0.91); language (six items, loadings ranged 0.58–0.95), and school readiness (six items, loadings ranged 0.56–0.77) 12 . The reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s alphas) indicating the internal consistency of the items in the Lene4 and Lene6 were 0.85 and 0.80 respectively (Appendix S1 supporting information published online).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations