1980
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.281.6254.1519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for congenital hypothyroidism in the Republic of Ireland.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence we found was closer to that found in China (1/5450), 3 Hungary (1/5470), 4 Moravia and Bohemia (1/5059; 1/5700) 5 and Slovakia (1/6874). 6 It was lower than the prevalence in Pakistan (1/1000), 7 North America (1/4254), 8 Switzerland (1/3000), 9 Kuwait (1/3476), 10 Ireland (1/4012) 11 and higher than the prevalence in Denmark (1/6064) 12 and Sweden (1/6900). 13 The prevalence of dyshormonogenesis we found was 1/7592 births.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The prevalence we found was closer to that found in China (1/5450), 3 Hungary (1/5470), 4 Moravia and Bohemia (1/5059; 1/5700) 5 and Slovakia (1/6874). 6 It was lower than the prevalence in Pakistan (1/1000), 7 North America (1/4254), 8 Switzerland (1/3000), 9 Kuwait (1/3476), 10 Ireland (1/4012) 11 and higher than the prevalence in Denmark (1/6064) 12 and Sweden (1/6900). 13 The prevalence of dyshormonogenesis we found was 1/7592 births.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Congenital hypothyroidism (CHT) affects approximately 1 in 2,000-4,000 births and is a cause of preventable neurodevelopmental disability [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Newborn screening programs have increased the rate of early detection of this condition and almost eradicated this complication of disease [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions to this, e.g. Dockeray 18 and Corbetta 20 , may be related to differences in screening procedures. Using the information provided within most papers, it is difficult to estimate the impact of having a borderline cut-off level on the frequency of repeat testing.…”
Section: Figure 2: Overview Of Screening Procedures Most Commonly Desmentioning
confidence: 99%