1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300001793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Congenital Abnormalities

Abstract: Improvements in nutrition, sanitation, housing, and medical care have been associated with reductions in infectious diseases of infancy, such as diarrhea, and, concomitantly, with a decline in infant mortality. Although deaths from congenital abnormalities have also decreased, the rate of their decline has not kept pace with the overall rate. Thus in the United States they have become the most frequent cause of infant death (58). For abnormalities detected in the newborn period, which comprise 3% of all births… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How, for instance, do the values of individuals and of society affect the development of medical technologies, their assessment, and their introduction into clinical practice? Recent evidence from the U.K., the United States, and now Switzerland indicates surprisingly good acceptance by pregnant women of alphafeto-protein (AFP) screening for neural tube defects in the fetus (3,4). This contrasts with attitudes of some decision makers, particularly in the U.S. (whose acceptance has been slow due to the abortion issue), and of the medical profession (who demand certain safeguards in the control of laboratories doing AFP-screening).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How, for instance, do the values of individuals and of society affect the development of medical technologies, their assessment, and their introduction into clinical practice? Recent evidence from the U.K., the United States, and now Switzerland indicates surprisingly good acceptance by pregnant women of alphafeto-protein (AFP) screening for neural tube defects in the fetus (3,4). This contrasts with attitudes of some decision makers, particularly in the U.S. (whose acceptance has been slow due to the abortion issue), and of the medical profession (who demand certain safeguards in the control of laboratories doing AFP-screening).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%