1998
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, public knowledge of chlamydia assumes greater importance once a screening programme is initiated. 10 Without knowledge, individuals may not participate or understand the implications. Education allows for informed consent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, public knowledge of chlamydia assumes greater importance once a screening programme is initiated. 10 Without knowledge, individuals may not participate or understand the implications. Education allows for informed consent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDITOR—We agree with the comments1 on Boag and Kelly's editorial2 about the recommendations made by the chief medical officer's expert advisory group on Chlamydia trachomatis . We wish to raise another issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…4,5,53 CT-screening: gebieden van onzekerheid CT-infectie voldoet volgens de buitenlandse literatuur geheel of gedeeltelijk aan deze screeningscriteria. [31][32][33][34] Sommige landen, zoals de VS, Zweden en het Verenigd Koninkrijk, raden al jaren screening van jonge vrouwen aan. Toch komen er de laatste jaren steeds meer kritische geluiden omtrent de sterkte van de bewijskracht voor screening.…”
Section: Er Moet Consensus Bestaan Over Wie Men Als Patiënt Beschouwtunclassified