2017
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Celiac Disease in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
80
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In the clinical suspicion of thyroid disease, a thyroid profile should be performed. Serologic tests for celiac disease should be used to exclude this condition in patients with symptoms of IBS-D and IBS-M [1,49]. Other differential diagnoses include bile-acid-induced diarrhoea and carbohydrate malabsorption.…”
Section: Laboratory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical suspicion of thyroid disease, a thyroid profile should be performed. Serologic tests for celiac disease should be used to exclude this condition in patients with symptoms of IBS-D and IBS-M [1,49]. Other differential diagnoses include bile-acid-induced diarrhoea and carbohydrate malabsorption.…”
Section: Laboratory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true for celiac disease, a common immune enteropathy of the small intestine[1], and the even more common functional intestinal disorders, which can also manifest with dyspepsia, bloating, abdominal pain, constipation or diarrhea[2]. The advent of serologic testing for celiac disease facilitated wider screening and it was soon recognized that celiac disease may be more common among patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) than among the general population[3] and may be increased in other functional GI disorders, such as functional dyspepsia (FD)[4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we relied on the fact that people who met the Rome IV criteria were likely to have IBS as a cause of their lower gastrointestinal symptoms. This may mean that we included some people with organic diseases such as celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease,[54][55][56] rather than true IBS, although as the prevalence of these conditions in the community is much lower than IBS, this is unlikely to have had any major impact on our results. Although this is a limitation, our methodology is similar to that used in numerous population-based studies that have estimated the prevalence of IBS in community subjects,2 and even studies examining yield of colonoscopy in patients meeting criteria for IBS in secondary care report a low prevalence of organic disease 57,58.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%