2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-013-0916-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for bladder cancer with urinary tumor markers in chemical workers with exposure to aromatic amines

Abstract: UroVysion in combination with NMP22 detected more cases than cytology alone, at the expense of a lower specificity. High costs per detected case resulted from a lower BC incidence than in the past when levels of occupational exposure to aromatic amines were higher. Currently, it cannot be recommended to apply these markers for screening in asymptomatic workers. The increase in sensitivity is not balanced by the high costs of UroVysion and the false-positive tests of NMP22.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In a sample of 1,609 men with former workplace exposure to aromatic amines, the UroVysion/NMP22 panel detected 14 of 21 tumors versus eight tumors with cytology alone. However, the increase in sensitivity compared with cytology was not balanced by the high costs of UroVysion and the false-positive tests of NMP22 [44]. Based on these results, it is not currently cost effective to apply these markers for screening in an asymptomatic population.…”
Section: Economic Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In a sample of 1,609 men with former workplace exposure to aromatic amines, the UroVysion/NMP22 panel detected 14 of 21 tumors versus eight tumors with cytology alone. However, the increase in sensitivity compared with cytology was not balanced by the high costs of UroVysion and the false-positive tests of NMP22 [44]. Based on these results, it is not currently cost effective to apply these markers for screening in an asymptomatic population.…”
Section: Economic Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Subsequent to the compilation of these recommendations, a few new articles have been published [219]. Indeed, authors analysed the performance of FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation) in combination with NMP22 for bladder cancer screening in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being in a chemical company, a potential exposure to carcinogenic substances in the past (eg, aromatic amines) may lead to increased risk of bladder cancer. On the other hand, preventive measures, such as a regular screening program that is offered to employees with past exposure to carcinogenic aromatic amines, may additionally introduce diagnostic bias (33). This may explain in part the increased SIR of bladder cancer in table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%