1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.t01-2-130105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for basiliximab exposure–response relationships in renal allotransplantation

Abstract: The immunosuppressant basiliximab--a chimeric monoclonal antibody specific to the interleukin-2 receptor on activated T-lymphocytes--significantly reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection following renal transplantation. Screening for exposure-response relationships was performed within a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial in which patients received 40 mg basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) by intravenous infusion in addition to cyclosporine and corticosteroids. In a subset of pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
23
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of basiliximab was monitored using anti‐CD25 antibodies, and saturation of the α‐chain of the IL‐2R was demonstrated to last for up to 6 weeks. No relationship between CD25 saturation and rejection was observed, similar to the results obtained in adult renal transplant recipients (14). The two patients who experienced a steroid‐resistant rejection during this time frame exhibited reduced CD25 saturation several days after clinical signs of rejection developed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The effect of basiliximab was monitored using anti‐CD25 antibodies, and saturation of the α‐chain of the IL‐2R was demonstrated to last for up to 6 weeks. No relationship between CD25 saturation and rejection was observed, similar to the results obtained in adult renal transplant recipients (14). The two patients who experienced a steroid‐resistant rejection during this time frame exhibited reduced CD25 saturation several days after clinical signs of rejection developed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A nonlinear relation was apparent between dose and AUC: Doubling the dose of basiliximab led to approximately a threefold increase in AUC, a finding that has not been observed previously at lower doses (up to 60 mg in total) . Clearance, that is, the linear component of basiliximab elimination, was lower in the current study (0.245L/day) than in previous reports (0.4–1.1L/day) , and the elimination half‐life (t 1/2β ) was 25.6 days compared to 6.5–14.4 days in other pharmacokinetic trials in kidney transplant patients . These findings could be accounted for by different analytical techniques or by the observed nonlinear elimination.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Among the five patients in this group who provided data to the end of the 12‐week study, T‐cell CD25 saturation was total in four cases (and 71% in the remaining case) at day 56 but was below 50% in all patients by day 84. Despite this extended saturation period as compared to previous pharmacodynamic studies , an entirely CNI‐free regimen with basiliximab induction at an increased cumulative dose of 80 mg did not appear to prevent early acute rejection adequately. The increased rate of acute rejection observed in the CNI‐free regimen is in agreement with the absence of synergistic benefit described between T‐cell receptor‐mediated production of IL‐2 blocked by CNI agents and the effect of IL‐2 receptor antibodies to limit IL‐2 mediated T‐cell proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This regimen provides CD25 saturation on peripheral blood T lymphocytes for an average of 36 ± 14 days, which covers the period in which the majority of acute rejection episodes occur. Pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic evaluations in both phase 3 trials for this transplant indication supported the dose regimen and indicated that those patients who experienced an acute rejection episode did not have a shorter duration of CD25 saturation compared with their rejection‐free peers 5 , 6 . Therefore the period of CD25 saturation achieved with this regimen appears to be appropriate, and prolonging the period would not likely improve the efficacy outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%