2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (N=85 209) examining systematic screening, opportunistic screening, and no screening determined that any AF screening (systematic or opportunistic) was associated with higher detection of AF (1.8% versus 1.3%; RR, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.20–3.65]) than no screening. 139…”
Section: Disorders Of Heart Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (N=85 209) examining systematic screening, opportunistic screening, and no screening determined that any AF screening (systematic or opportunistic) was associated with higher detection of AF (1.8% versus 1.3%; RR, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.20–3.65]) than no screening. 139…”
Section: Disorders Of Heart Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another meta-analysis of 9 studies and overall 85,209 patients, which differed by one study from the previous meta-analysis (mSTOPS instead of HECTOR-AF), any AF screening (either systematic or opportunistic) was associated with higher initiation of oral anticoagulation (RR 3.26; 95% CI 1.15–9.23), compared with no screening. 43 There was no significant difference between any AF screening vs no screening in all-cause mortality (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–1.01) or acute cerebrovascular accident (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84–1.01). Only systematic screening was associated with higher initiation of oral anticoagulation (RR 5.67; 95% CI 2.68–11.99), compared with no screening.…”
Section: Different Approaches For Atrial Fibrillation Screeningmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Opportunistic screening using the single-lead ECG or combined with pulse palpation and blood pressure measurement in individuals aged ≥ 65 years did not significantly increase the detection rate of AF. [34][35][36] Systematic screening in individuals aged ≥ 70 years without AF can significantly increase the detection rate of AF, but the benefits of anticoagulation therapy based on screening results remain controversial. [37][38][39] Based on current evidence, the Guidelines recommend considering opportunistic screening for AF through pulse palpation or ECG during medical visits for individuals aged ≥ 65 years and considering systematic screening for AF through regular or continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for individuals aged ≥ 70 years.…”
Section: Af Screening In the General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opportunistic screening for AF can be considered in individuals aged ≥ 65 years during medical visits, using methods such as pulse palpation or electrocardiography. [34][35][36] Ⅱb A Systematic screening for AF through regular or continuous electrocardiographic monitoring may be considered in the population aged ≥ 70 years. [37][38][39] Ⅱb A…”
Section: General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%