2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10989-017-9580-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for a Potent Antibacterial Peptide to Treat Mupirocin-Resistant MRSA Skin Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vancomycin, which also showed a time-dependent bactericidal activity, was reported to exhibit a slow killing rate against MRSA ( Isnansetyo & Kamei, 2003 ). Antibacterial compounds with rapid bactericidal activity are considered potential as they can rapidly eliminate the pathogen and thereby reduce the chances for resistance development ( Ng et al, 2017 ). The distinction of superiority between bactericidal and bacteriostatic agents from in vitro studies, however, is of little relevance when treating infection in clinical situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vancomycin, which also showed a time-dependent bactericidal activity, was reported to exhibit a slow killing rate against MRSA ( Isnansetyo & Kamei, 2003 ). Antibacterial compounds with rapid bactericidal activity are considered potential as they can rapidly eliminate the pathogen and thereby reduce the chances for resistance development ( Ng et al, 2017 ). The distinction of superiority between bactericidal and bacteriostatic agents from in vitro studies, however, is of little relevance when treating infection in clinical situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a starting point, we conducted a head‐to‐head minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) comparison of 61 AMPs, up to 11 residues long, against mupirocin‐resistant MRSA (Ng, Ching, et al., 2017). The most potent AMP was found to be the 11‐residue peptide 3.1 (KKLLKWLLKLL‐NH2), designed by Kang and co‐workers at Seoul National University (Kang et al., 2009) which exhibited an MIC of 3.13 µM against mupirocin‐resistant MRSA (Ng, Ching, et al., 2017). Peptide 3.1 is a leucine‐ and lysine‐rich synthetic peptide rationally designed from alpha‐helical wheel modelling (Kang et al., 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second hurdle, manufacturing cost can be kept low by minimizing peptide length and designing AMPs made up of cheaper amino acids and avoiding expensive amino acids like arginine, tryptophan and unnatural amino acids. As a starting point, we conducted a head‐to‐head minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) comparison of 61 AMPs, up to 11 residues long, against mupirocin‐resistant MRSA (Ng, Ching, et al., 2017). The most potent AMP was found to be the 11‐residue peptide 3.1 (KKLLKWLLKLL‐NH2), designed by Kang and co‐workers at Seoul National University (Kang et al., 2009) which exhibited an MIC of 3.13 µM against mupirocin‐resistant MRSA (Ng, Ching, et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%