2008
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2007.127563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Experiments and the Use of Fractional Factorial Designs in Behavioral Intervention Research

Abstract: Health-behavior intervention studies have focused primarily on comparing a new program over the control using randomized controlled trials. However, we are seeing a dramatic increase in the number of possible components (factors) due to developments in science and technology (internet, web-based surveys, and so on). These changes dictate the need for alternative methods that can screen a large set of potentially important components in order to identify the important ones quickly and economically. We have deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, we present a novel analysis from a precision medicine perspective using the notion of TR; this type of analysis will help understand what type of smokers will benefit from a tailored smoking cessation intervention in terms of optimizing their quitting process. As mentioned previously, the results suggest that smokers with low education are more likely to benefit from tailored interventions; this is consistent with the prior findings based on the seven-day point prevalence data [8,[19][20]. Thus, our current analysis re-confirms the role of number of quit attempts as an additional outcome over the commonly-used point prevalence outcome.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, we present a novel analysis from a precision medicine perspective using the notion of TR; this type of analysis will help understand what type of smokers will benefit from a tailored smoking cessation intervention in terms of optimizing their quitting process. As mentioned previously, the results suggest that smokers with low education are more likely to benefit from tailored interventions; this is consistent with the prior findings based on the seven-day point prevalence data [8,[19][20]. Thus, our current analysis re-confirms the role of number of quit attempts as an additional outcome over the commonly-used point prevalence outcome.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The primary aim of the study was to identify and test the effects of five psychosocial and communication intervention components influencing smoking cessation [8]. In order to screen multiple components, the study employed a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) [21] framework, implemented using a 16-cell (2 ) fractional factorial design [19,22] in which each of the five components (outcome expectations, efficacy expectations, success stories, message source, and message exposure) were varied at two levels, high vs. low. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of each collaborating institution and of the University of Michigan in January 2004.…”
Section: Project Quit Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…92,94 Innovative and cost-effective methods for designing and assessing programme adaptations are emerging in prevention science to guide this process. 95 …”
Section: Translation Of Efficacious Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2012;44: [49][50][51][52][53][54][55] intervention (individuals, neighborhood, and community) to increase influenza vaccination areas in New York City. They also did not attempt to assess the relative or incremental contribution of the different components but only the overall impact on individuals.…”
Section: Measuring Effects Of Different Levels Of An Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One then could evaluate the feasibility and cost of different designs that allow testing of those effects (41,53). Some interactions might not be worth testing because the components involved are clearly dependent in one another.…”
Section: Intervention Designmentioning
confidence: 99%