2017
DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2017.09.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening endoscopy for gastric cancer: time for quality control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 However, the interval of cancer screening has been determined empirically, and there is no clear evidence as to the optimal screening interval. 24 In this study, periodic methylation was observed in consistent with the cyclic stabilization of cancer-prone stem cells every 8 years. A previous gastric cancer screening at 5-year intervals revealed a decrease in the incidence of gastric cancer at the first follow-up and an increase at the second follow-up.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…22,23 However, the interval of cancer screening has been determined empirically, and there is no clear evidence as to the optimal screening interval. 24 In this study, periodic methylation was observed in consistent with the cyclic stabilization of cancer-prone stem cells every 8 years. A previous gastric cancer screening at 5-year intervals revealed a decrease in the incidence of gastric cancer at the first follow-up and an increase at the second follow-up.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Similar endoscopic biopsy rates (32.6% vs 32.4%, P = 0.945) were observed between the 2 stages, suggesting that increased detectability was not achieved through increased biopsy but might be attributed to increased care of endoscopists or more target biopsies performed. Moreover, the Hawthorne effect ( 24 ), which describes the reactivity in which individuals modify their behaviors in response to their awareness of being observed, might also play a role in the research effect. However, the neoplastic lesion detection rate did not differ significantly between the 2 stages (1.8% vs 2.2%, P = 0.483).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no national screening program for GC in Vietnam, and some hospitals designed their own surveillance schedules. Recent studies reported that a surveillance interval of every two years would be ideal to detect GC in the early stages [14,15], but the crucial issue would be the quality of the index EGD endoscopic examination as well as the endoscopist's experience in recognizing [16]. This is an important issue which should be further investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%