Persistent Organic Pollutants and Toxic Metals in Foods 2013
DOI: 10.1533/9780857098917.1.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and confirmatory methods for the detection of heavy metals in foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SEADs (Figure 1) consist of 3 major compo nents: (1) an electrochemical sensor, (2) a wireless potentiostat, and (3) smartphone com munication and connection technology. The electrochemical sensors are fabricated and modified by nanomaterials to detect specific heavy metal ions from redox reactions, involving electrons transferred between electrodes in an electrolyte [18,19], and are remarkable for their high precision, selectivity, and sensitivity. Electrochemical sensors make sophisticated laboratory experiments simple, rapid, economical, portable, and user-friendly.…”
Section: Smartphone-based Electrochemical Analytical Devices For Heavy Metal Detection (Sead)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEADs (Figure 1) consist of 3 major compo nents: (1) an electrochemical sensor, (2) a wireless potentiostat, and (3) smartphone com munication and connection technology. The electrochemical sensors are fabricated and modified by nanomaterials to detect specific heavy metal ions from redox reactions, involving electrons transferred between electrodes in an electrolyte [18,19], and are remarkable for their high precision, selectivity, and sensitivity. Electrochemical sensors make sophisticated laboratory experiments simple, rapid, economical, portable, and user-friendly.…”
Section: Smartphone-based Electrochemical Analytical Devices For Heavy Metal Detection (Sead)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional methods for the detection of HMIs, electrochemical techniques that take advantage of the portable, rapid, low-priced, and inherent electrochemical activity of HMIs [2] provide a better alternative for their detection. The comparison of HMI detection with electrochemical methods and other widely used techniques is shown in Table S1 [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The screen-printed electrode (SPE) has received wide attention for its intrinsic properties, such as small size, light weight, ease of mass production, and low cost [23], which makes it suitable for on-site rapid detection compared with the traditional glassy carbon electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%