2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.195401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and collective modes in disordered graphene antidot lattices

Abstract: The excitation spectrum and the collective modes of graphene antidot lattices (GALs) are studied in the context of a π -band tight-binding model. The dynamical polarizability and dielectric function are calculated within the random-phase approximation. The effect of different kinds of disorder, such as geometric and chemical disorder, are included in our calculations. We highlight the main differences of GALs with respect to single-layer graphene (SLG). Our results show that, in addition to the well-understood… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may, however, be possible to control the antidot edge geometries to some extent by heat treatment [38,45] or selective etching [37,46]. Much like the properties of nanoribbons were found to be greatly affected by disorder [47,48], recent studies suggest that the electronic and optical properties of GALs may also be strongly perturbed [21,22,24,27]. We should therefore expect that the transport properties and device fidelity of the systems described above will depend on the degree of disorder present in the antidot lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may, however, be possible to control the antidot edge geometries to some extent by heat treatment [38,45] or selective etching [37,46]. Much like the properties of nanoribbons were found to be greatly affected by disorder [47,48], recent studies suggest that the electronic and optical properties of GALs may also be strongly perturbed [21,22,24,27]. We should therefore expect that the transport properties and device fidelity of the systems described above will depend on the degree of disorder present in the antidot lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ( [19,21,22] studied these disorders separately, we also consider the situation where these two types of disorder coexist, as illustrated in Fig. 1(d).…”
Section: A Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuations of radii and centers can be regarded as radius and center disorder, respectively, which are collectively referred to as geometrical disorder [19,21,22]. We quantify the radius disorder by δ R in such a way that the radii R i of the antidots take the following values with uniform probability:…”
Section: A Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major issue is the deterioration of the graphene sheet quality and the difficulty in maintaining a uniform size and separation of antidots throughout the lattice. Indeed, the band-gap behavior predicted for certain lattice geometries [23,24,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] is particularly sensitive to small levels of geometric disorder, which may not be possible to eliminate in experiment [46][47][48][49][50][51]. Although such uniformity is not an essential ingredient for commensurability oscillations, invasive etching processes usually reduce the mean free path significantly so that electrons are principally scattered by defects and not antidots, thus suppressing commensurability effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%