1990
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(90)85018-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screened dipolar interactions in some molecular crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There appears to have existed a notion (recently refuted by a statistical analysis) that polar molecules tend to crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups. Munn and Hurst suggested earlier that this notion might be connected to a destabilizing surface energy in polar space groups. They criticized this idea, referring to “the experimental observation that polar molecular crystals do not usually exhibit a macroscopic dipole moment”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There appears to have existed a notion (recently refuted by a statistical analysis) that polar molecules tend to crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups. Munn and Hurst suggested earlier that this notion might be connected to a destabilizing surface energy in polar space groups. They criticized this idea, referring to “the experimental observation that polar molecular crystals do not usually exhibit a macroscopic dipole moment”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sigelle et al showed that POM retains the NLO properties while crystallizing in the noncentrosymmetric space group P 2 1 2 1 2 1 . The X-ray structure of POM had been determined earlier by Shiro et al, and a recent study by Munn and Hurst shows that the dipole sum in POM crystals nearly vanishes. Subsequently, the electrooptic (EO) coefficients of POM crystals were measured by Sigelle and Hierle, and Zyss et al also determined the acoustic and acoustooptic properties and studied the second harmonic and sum-frequency generation in POM …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Permanent fields in molecular crystals are calculated to be of the order of 10 GV m Ϫ1 and may vary by 50% from the bulk into the surface layer. 12 These fields are large enough to produce effective dipole moments in the bulk crystal environment that are calculated to be as much as 50% different from those of the free molecules, 16,17 and precise electron density measurements backed up by ab initio molecular orbital calculations confirm that the effective dipole moment of MNA in the crystal is considerably enhanced over that in the gas phase. 18 These two mechanisms both concern the dielectric response of the crystal, and are treated by similar formalisms.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Surface Shgmentioning
confidence: 94%