1999
DOI: 10.1007/s100520050038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screened-Coulomb ansatz for the nonfactorizable radiative corrections to off-shell $W^+W^-$ production

Abstract: We demonstrate that the results of the complete first order calculation of the non-factorizable QED corrections to the single-inclusive cross-sections for e + e − → W + W − → 4 fermions could be very well reproduced by a simple physically motivated ansatz. The latter allows to take into account effectively the screening role of the non-Coulomb radiative mechanisms by introducing a dampening factor in front of the width-dependent part of the known first-order Coulomb correction, the so-called screened-Coulomb a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unweighted events from KORALW include non-factorizable QED corrections [37] which effectively "screen" the Coulomb interaction [30] between the two W's. It is suggested [38] that the difference between this "screened" Coulomb correction and no Coulomb correction can be used to assess an uncertainty.…”
Section: Coulomb Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unweighted events from KORALW include non-factorizable QED corrections [37] which effectively "screen" the Coulomb interaction [30] between the two W's. It is suggested [38] that the difference between this "screened" Coulomb correction and no Coulomb correction can be used to assess an uncertainty.…”
Section: Coulomb Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• no Coulomb correction, Khoze-Chapovsky ansatz Coulomb correction [20] implemented through reweighting.…”
Section: Description Of the Setups And Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the effect that theoretical uncertainty in the description of the radiation had on the selection efficiency, the results obtained in the DELPHI setup were compared with a simulation making use of RacoonWW [34] on the testbench process udµν µ . The two programs differed in many respects in the treatment of QED radiation: YFSWW was a e + e − → W + W − → 4f generator (CC03 diagrams only) with O(α) factorisable electroweak corrections and nonfactorisable corrections implemented via the so-called Khoze-Chapovsky ansatz (KC) [38]. It included ISR in leading logarithm approximation (LL) O(α 3 ) via YFS exponentiation [39] and final state radiation (FSR) LL O(α 2 ) via PHOTOS [40].…”
Section: Radiative Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%