1971
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/4/3/305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screened and unscreened axially-cylindrical surface-waves

Abstract: A coaxial cable can be regarded as a screened surface waveguide and, for wall impedances of any given value, propagation in the dominant mode, not subject to cut-off, is examined.The effect of loading a supporting surface is seen to reduce dispersion and the proximity of the outer surface to the inner is shown to affect the rate of decay of the field in the radial plane.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is well known as reflected guided BHR electromagnetic (EM) wave events which are often ob-served as obliquely striped patterns in BHR profiles when a conventional BHR is attached to a metallic communication cable, or used in a conductive saline water-filled borehole (Wright, Watts and Bramsoe 1984;Sato and Thierbach 1991;Dubois 1995;Ebihara, Sato and Niitsuma 1998;Guy and Radzevicius 2001;Vogt 2004;Ellefsen and Wright 2005;Mason et al 2008). These guided BHR waves are formed by Goubau waveguides (Goubau 1950;Barlow 1971;Laurette et al 2012). They are usually considered as 'unwanted' interference to the normal BHR surveying, and should be suppressed through either BHR hardware design (Cho et al 2013) or data processing (Ebihara, Sasakura and Takemoto 2011;Huo et al 2019a,b).…”
Section: Guided Bhr Wave Imaging and Top Coal Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is well known as reflected guided BHR electromagnetic (EM) wave events which are often ob-served as obliquely striped patterns in BHR profiles when a conventional BHR is attached to a metallic communication cable, or used in a conductive saline water-filled borehole (Wright, Watts and Bramsoe 1984;Sato and Thierbach 1991;Dubois 1995;Ebihara, Sato and Niitsuma 1998;Guy and Radzevicius 2001;Vogt 2004;Ellefsen and Wright 2005;Mason et al 2008). These guided BHR waves are formed by Goubau waveguides (Goubau 1950;Barlow 1971;Laurette et al 2012). They are usually considered as 'unwanted' interference to the normal BHR surveying, and should be suppressed through either BHR hardware design (Cho et al 2013) or data processing (Ebihara, Sasakura and Takemoto 2011;Huo et al 2019a,b).…”
Section: Guided Bhr Wave Imaging and Top Coal Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guiding characteristics of a conductor coated with a dielectric sheath, in this case water, are well-known [5], [9], [16]- [18].…”
Section: B Guided Wave Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided BHR EM wave propagation can be then observed along the wire [1], [22]- [26] and the conductive water column [25]- [28]. The EM wave guiding characteristics of a conductor in a dielectric layer or water for the case of BHR are well investigated [ [29]- [31]. The guided BHR EM wave can interfere with normal BHR waves and should be suppressed through BHR design [32] or data filtering [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%